These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17164532)

  • 1. Ligand identification using electron-density map correlations.
    Terwilliger TC; Adams PD; Moriarty NW; Cohn JD
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2007 Jan; 63(Pt 1):101-7. PubMed ID: 17164532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted assignment of ligands corresponding to unknown electron density.
    Binkowski TA; Cuff M; Nocek B; Chang C; Joachimiak A
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2010 Mar; 11(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 20091237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of ligands in macromolecular structures determined by X-ray crystallography.
    Smart OS; Horský V; Gore S; Svobodová Vařeková R; Bendová V; Kleywegt GJ; Velankar S
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2018 Mar; 74(Pt 3):228-236. PubMed ID: 29533230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. qFit-ligand Reveals Widespread Conformational Heterogeneity of Drug-Like Molecules in X-Ray Electron Density Maps.
    van Zundert GCP; Hudson BM; de Oliveira SHP; Keedy DA; Fonseca R; Heliou A; Suresh P; Borrelli K; Day T; Fraser JS; van den Bedem H
    J Med Chem; 2018 Dec; 61(24):11183-11198. PubMed ID: 30457858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fragmentation-tree density representation for crystallographic modelling of bound ligands.
    Langer GG; Evrard GX; Carolan CG; Lamzin VS
    J Mol Biol; 2012 Jun; 419(3-4):211-22. PubMed ID: 22446381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated ligand fitting by core-fragment fitting and extension into density.
    Terwilliger TC; Klei H; Adams PD; Moriarty NW; Cohn JD
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2006 Aug; 62(Pt 8):915-22. PubMed ID: 16855309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of automatic ligand building in ARP/wARP.
    Evrard GX; Langer GG; Perrakis A; Lamzin VS
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2007 Jan; 63(Pt 1):108-17. PubMed ID: 17164533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting up a large set of protein-ligand PDB complexes for the development and validation of knowledge-based docking algorithms.
    Diago LA; Morell P; Aguilera L; Moreno E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 8():310. PubMed ID: 17718923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction.
    Nissink JW; Murray C; Hartshorn M; Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Taylor R
    Proteins; 2002 Dec; 49(4):457-71. PubMed ID: 12402356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. '
    Chakraborti S; Hatti K; Srinivasan N
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 34202053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. You are lost without a map: Navigating the sea of protein structures.
    Lamb AL; Kappock TJ; Silvaggi NR
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Apr; 1854(4):258-68. PubMed ID: 25554228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Twilight reloaded: the peptide experience.
    Weichenberger CX; Pozharski E; Rupp B
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Mar; 73(Pt 3):211-222. PubMed ID: 28291756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducing crystal binding modes of ligand functional groups using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations.
    Raman EP; Yu W; Guvench O; Mackerell AD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):877-96. PubMed ID: 21456594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional protein-ligand interaction scaling of two-dimensional fingerprints.
    Tan L; Vogt M; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Nov; 74(5):449-56. PubMed ID: 19793181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome of the First wwPDB/CCDC/D3R Ligand Validation Workshop.
    Adams PD; Aertgeerts K; Bauer C; Bell JA; Berman HM; Bhat TN; Blaney JM; Bolton E; Bricogne G; Brown D; Burley SK; Case DA; Clark KL; Darden T; Emsley P; Feher VA; Feng Z; Groom CR; Harris SF; Hendle J; Holder T; Joachimiak A; Kleywegt GJ; Krojer T; Marcotrigiano J; Mark AE; Markley JL; Miller M; Minor W; Montelione GT; Murshudov G; Nakagawa A; Nakamura H; Nicholls A; Nicklaus M; Nolte RT; Padyana AK; Peishoff CE; Pieniazek S; Read RJ; Shao C; Sheriff S; Smart O; Soisson S; Spurlino J; Stouch T; Svobodova R; Tempel W; Terwilliger TC; Tronrud D; Velankar S; Ward SC; Warren GL; Westbrook JD; Williams P; Yang H; Young J
    Structure; 2016 Apr; 24(4):502-508. PubMed ID: 27050687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
    Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of the protein-ligand interaction energy for model building and validation.
    Beshnova DA; Pereira J; Lamzin VS
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Mar; 73(Pt 3):195-202. PubMed ID: 28291754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated identification of crystallographic ligands using sparse-density representations.
    Carolan CG; Lamzin VS
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2014 Jul; 70(Pt 7):1844-53. PubMed ID: 25004962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein-ligand interactions.
    Paul N; Rognan D
    Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 12001231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.