355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17165812)
21. A model for Joule heating-induced dispersion in microchip electrophoresis.
Wang Y; Lin Q; Mukherjee T
Lab Chip; 2004 Dec; 4(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 15570376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. On-chip free-flow magnetophoresis: continuous flow separation of magnetic particles and agglomerates.
Pamme N; Manz A
Anal Chem; 2004 Dec; 76(24):7250-6. PubMed ID: 15595866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hydrodynamic focusing investigation in a micro-flow cytometer.
Yang AS; Hsieh WH
Biomed Microdevices; 2007 Apr; 9(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 17151936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mass transport in a micro flow-through vial of a junction-at-the-tip capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry interface.
Zhong X; Maxwell EJ; Chen DD
Anal Chem; 2011 Jun; 83(12):4916-23. PubMed ID: 21528898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Electrokinetic transport in nanochannels. 1. Theory.
Pennathur S; Santiago JG
Anal Chem; 2005 Nov; 77(21):6772-81. PubMed ID: 16255573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Formation of stable stacking zones in a flow stream for sample immobilization in microfluidic systems.
Astorga-Wells J; Vollmer S; Bergman T; Jörnvall H
Anal Chem; 2007 Feb; 79(3):1057-63. PubMed ID: 17263335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Continuous microfluidic DNA and protein trapping and concentration by balancing transverse electrokinetic forces.
Morales MC; Lin H; Zahn JD
Lab Chip; 2012 Jan; 12(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 22045330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Toolbox for the design of optimized microfluidic components.
Mott DR; Howell PB; Golden JP; Kaplan CR; Ligler FS; Oran ES
Lab Chip; 2006 Apr; 6(4):540-9. PubMed ID: 16572217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Electroosmotic flow patterning using microfluidic delay loops.
Schönfeld F; Hardt S; Böhm M; Püschl RJ; Walder M; Wenclawiak B
Lab Chip; 2006 Dec; 6(12):1525-9. PubMed ID: 17203156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Electrokinetic flow control in microfluidic chips using a field-effect transistor.
Horiuchi K; Dutta P
Lab Chip; 2006 Jun; 6(6):714-23. PubMed ID: 16738721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Enhancement of electrokinetically driven microfluidic T-mixer using frequency modulated electric field and channel geometry effects.
Yan D; Yang C; Miao J; Lam Y; Huang X
Electrophoresis; 2009 Sep; 30(18):3144-52. PubMed ID: 19764063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microfluidic electrophoresis chip coupled to microdialysis for in vivo monitoring of amino acid neurotransmitters.
Sandlin ZD; Shou M; Shackman JG; Kennedy RT
Anal Chem; 2005 Dec; 77(23):7702-8. PubMed ID: 16316179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An analytic description of electrodynamic dispersion in free-flow zone electrophoresis.
Dutta D
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Jul; 1404():124-30. PubMed ID: 26044384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microsystem for field-amplified electrokinetic trapping preconcentration of DNA at poly(ethylene terephthalate) membranes.
Hahn T; O'Sullivan CK; Drese KS
Anal Chem; 2009 Apr; 81(8):2904-11. PubMed ID: 19296594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of Joule heating and its effects on electroosmotic flow and electrophoretic transport of solutes in microfluidic channels.
Tang G; Yan D; Yang C; Gong H; Chai JC; Lam YC
Electrophoresis; 2006 Feb; 27(3):628-39. PubMed ID: 16456892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electroosmotic flow analysis of a branched U-turn nanofluidic device.
Parikesit GO; Markesteijn AP; Kutchoukov VG; Piciu O; Bossche A; Westerweel J; Garini Y; Young IT
Lab Chip; 2005 Oct; 5(10):1067-74. PubMed ID: 16175262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Electroosmotic guiding of sample flows in a laminar flow chamber.
Besselink GA; Vulto P; Lammertink RG; Schlautmann S; van den Berg A; Olthuis W; Engbers GH; Schasfoort RB
Electrophoresis; 2004 Nov; 25(21-22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 15565693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Importance and reduction of the sidewall-induced band-broadening effect in pressure-driven microfabricated columns.
Vervoort N; Billen J; Gzil P; Baron GV; Desmet G
Anal Chem; 2004 Aug; 76(15):4501-7. PubMed ID: 15283594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Flow counterbalanced capillary electrophoresis using packed capillary columns: resolution of enantiomers and isotopomers.
Henley WH; Wilburn RT; Crouch AM; Jorgenson JW
Anal Chem; 2005 Nov; 77(21):7024-31. PubMed ID: 16255605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of diffusion on impedance measurements in a hydrodynamic flow focusing sensor.
Nasir M; Price DT; Shriver-Lake LC; Ligler F
Lab Chip; 2010 Oct; 10(20):2787-95. PubMed ID: 20725680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
