BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17166493)

  • 1. Assessment factors--applications in health risk assessment of chemicals.
    Falk-Filipsson A; Hanberg A; Victorin K; Warholm M; Wallén M
    Environ Res; 2007 May; 104(1):108-27. PubMed ID: 17166493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deriving a data-based interspecies assessment factor using the NOAEL and the benchmark dose approach.
    Bokkers BG; Slob W
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007 Jun; 37(5):355-73. PubMed ID: 17612951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Situations with enhanced chemical risks due to toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic factors.
    Dybing E; Søderlund EJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S27-30. PubMed ID: 10597610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolution of science-based uncertainty factors in noncancer risk assessment.
    Dourson ML; Felter SP; Robinson D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Oct; 24(2 Pt 1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8933624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodologies, bioindicators, and biomarkers for assessing gender-related differences in wildlife exposed to environmental chemicals.
    Burger J; Fossi C; McClellan-Green P; Orlando EF
    Environ Res; 2007 May; 104(1):135-52. PubMed ID: 17207477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implications of gender differences for human health risk assessment and toxicology.
    Vahter M; Gochfeld M; Casati B; Thiruchelvam M; Falk-Filippson A; Kavlock R; Marafante E; Cory-Slechta D
    Environ Res; 2007 May; 104(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 17098226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A framework and methods for incorporating gender-related issues in wildlife risk assessment: gender-related differences in metal levels and other contaminants as a case study.
    Burger J
    Environ Res; 2007 May; 104(1):153-62. PubMed ID: 17045984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of inter-individual differences in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics on safety evaluation.
    Dorne JL
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Dec; 18(6):609-20. PubMed ID: 15548231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toxicity assessment of unintentional exposure to multiple chemicals.
    Mumtaz MM; Ruiz P; De Rosa CT
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Sep; 223(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 17599373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A probabilistic effect assessment model for hazardous substances at the workplace.
    Schneider K; Schuhmacher-Wolz U; Hassauer M; Darschnik S; Elmshäuser E; Mosbach-Schulz O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 16356615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gender-based differences in endocrine and reproductive toxicity.
    Cummings AM; Stoker T; Kavlock RJ
    Environ Res; 2007 May; 104(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 17157289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human variability in xenobiotic metabolism and pathway-related uncertainty factors for chemical risk assessment: a review.
    Dorne JL; Walton K; Renwick AG
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 43(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 15621332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilizing uncertainty factors in minimal risk levels derivation.
    Pohl HR; Abadin HG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Oct; 22(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 8577953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Addressing human variability in risk assessment--the robustness of the intraspecies uncertainty factor.
    Burin GJ; Saunders DR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Dec; 30(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 10620470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Framework for gender differences in human and animal toxicology.
    Gochfeld M
    Environ Res; 2007 May; 104(1):4-21. PubMed ID: 16616135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental risk assessment of zinc in European freshwaters: a critical appraisal.
    Van Sprang PA; Verdonck FA; Van Assche F; Regoli L; De Schamphelaere KA
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Oct; 407(20):5373-91. PubMed ID: 19631966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Factors contributing to interindividual variability to chemical toxicity].
    Lindeman B; Søderlund EJ; Dybing E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Feb; 122(6):615-8. PubMed ID: 11998714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toxicokinetics and physiologically based toxicokinetics in toxicology and risk assessment.
    Dixit R; Riviere J; Krishnan K; Andersen ME
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 12587252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human variability in hepatic and renal elimination: implications for risk assessment.
    Dorne JL
    J Appl Toxicol; 2007; 27(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 17497760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.