These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17166504)

  • 21. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method.
    Andreaus U; Colloca M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 19623912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tibio-femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing.
    Taylor WR; Heller MO; Bergmann G; Duda GN
    J Orthop Res; 2004 May; 22(3):625-32. PubMed ID: 15099644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data.
    Rohlmann A; Bauer L; Zander T; Bergmann G; Wilke HJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 16549091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contributions of individual muscles to hip joint contact force in normal walking.
    Correa TA; Crossley KM; Kim HJ; Pandy MG
    J Biomech; 2010 May; 43(8):1618-22. PubMed ID: 20176362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Finite element analysis of a bone-implant system with the proximal femur nail.
    Helwig P; Faust G; Hindenlang U; Kröplin B; Eingartner C
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):411-9. PubMed ID: 17065762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
    Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Femoral neck strain prediction during level walking using a combined musculoskeletal and finite element model approach.
    Altai Z; Montefiori E; van Veen B; A Paggiosi M; McCloskey EV; Viceconti M; Mazzà C; Li X
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245121. PubMed ID: 33524024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of varus/valgus malalignment on bone strains in the proximal tibia after TKR: an explicit finite element study.
    Perillo-Marcone A; Taylor M
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17227092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A fatigue loading model for investigation of iatrogenic subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.
    Tsai AG; Reich MS; Bensusan J; Ashworth T; Marcus RE; Akkus O
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2013; 28(9-10):981-7. PubMed ID: 24125692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
    Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Aug; 22(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 17544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite element modelling of the pelvis: inclusion of muscular and ligamentous boundary conditions.
    Phillips AT; Pankaj P; Howie CR; Usmani AS; Simpson AH
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Sep; 29(7):739-48. PubMed ID: 17035063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subject-specific hip geometry affects predicted hip joint contact forces during gait.
    Lenaerts G; De Groote F; Demeulenaere B; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Spaepen A; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(6):1243-52. PubMed ID: 18346745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selecting boundary conditions in physiological strain analysis of the femur: Balanced loads, inertia relief method and follower load.
    Heyland M; Trepczynski A; Duda GN; Zehn M; Schaser KD; Märdian S
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Dec; 37(12):1180-5. PubMed ID: 26521092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Simulation of physiological loading in total hip replacements.
    Ramos A; Fonseca F; Simões JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 16813449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Techniques for modeling muscle-induced forces in finite element models of skeletal structures.
    Grosse IR; Dumont ER; Coletta C; Tolleson A
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2007 Sep; 290(9):1069-88. PubMed ID: 17721980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An Integrated Musculoskeletal-Finite-Element Model to Evaluate Effects of Load Carriage on the Tibia During Walking.
    Xu C; Silder A; Zhang J; Hughes J; Unnikrishnan G; Reifman J; Rakesh V
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Oct; 138(10):. PubMed ID: 27437640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intraarticular pressure distribution in the talocrural joint is related to lower leg muscle forces.
    Potthast W; Lersch C; Segesser B; Koebke J; Brüggemann GP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Jun; 23(5):632-9. PubMed ID: 18082921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multilevel finite element modeling for the prediction of local cellular deformation in bone.
    Deligianni DD; Apostolopoulos CA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Apr; 7(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 17431696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.