BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17166526)

  • 1. The processing of linear perspective and binocular information for action and perception.
    Bruggeman H; Yonas A; Konczak J
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1420-6. PubMed ID: 17166526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of overlay symbology in night vision goggles on accommodation and attention shift.
    Schor CM; Task HL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Nov; 67(11):1039-47. PubMed ID: 8908341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting slant-in-depth of real trapezoidal and rectangular surfaces: moving-monocular viewing equivalent to stationary-binocular viewing.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1993 Apr; 120(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 8245918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Space perception of strabismic observers in the real world environment.
    Ooi TL; He ZJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Feb; 56(3):1761-8. PubMed ID: 25698702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motion parallax enables depth processing for action in a visual form agnosic when binocular vision is unavailable.
    Dijkerman HC; Milner AD; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1505-10. PubMed ID: 10617271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceiving the orientation-in-depth of triangular surfaces: static-monocular, moving-monocular, and static-binocular viewing.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1996 Jan; 123(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 8901208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of infants' sensitivity to surface contour information for spatial layout.
    Sen MG; Yonas A; Knill DC
    Perception; 2001; 30(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 11296498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monocular and binocular vision in the control of goal-directed movement.
    Coull J; Weir PL; Tremblay L; Weeks DJ; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2000 Dec; 32(4):347-60. PubMed ID: 11114228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infants' ability to respond to depth from the retinal size of human faces: comparing monocular and binocular preferential-looking.
    Tsuruhara A; Corrow S; Kanazawa S; Yamaguchi MK; Yonas A
    Infant Behav Dev; 2014 Nov; 37(4):562-70. PubMed ID: 25113916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping.
    Marotta JJ; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Aug; 121(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 9746154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The design of telepresence systems: the task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax.
    Parton AD; Bradshaw MF; De Bruyn B
    Int J Cogn Ergon; 1999; 3(3):189-202. PubMed ID: 11543418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of 3-D digitizing in stereoscopic images.
    Inoue T; Kawai T; Noro K
    Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1357-63. PubMed ID: 8974886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The framing effect with rectangular and trapezoidal surfaces: actual and pictorial surface slant, frame orientation, and viewing condition.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    Perception; 1999; 28(11):1361-71. PubMed ID: 10755145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Otto-de Haart EG; Carey DP; Milne AB
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1437-44. PubMed ID: 10617263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary depth cues and background pattern in the portrayal of slant.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1992 Jan; 119(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 1613487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study on visual characteristics of binocular 3-D images.
    Cho A; Iwasaki T; Noro K
    Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1285-93. PubMed ID: 8888640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Focus cues affect perceived depth.
    Watt SJ; Akeley K; Ernst MO; Banks MS
    J Vis; 2005 Dec; 5(10):834-62. PubMed ID: 16441189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of light intensity on binocular distance perception].
    Heller J; Reyersbach R
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(2):237-55. PubMed ID: 7497071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Encoding of geometric and landmark information in the left and right hemispheres of the Avian Brain.
    Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
    Behav Neurosci; 2001 Jun; 115(3):602-13. PubMed ID: 11439449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems.
    Servos P
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 130(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 10638439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.