494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17166589)
1. An empirical investigation of insanity defense attitudes: exploring factors related to bias.
Bloechl AL; Vitacco MJ; Neumann CS; Erickson SE
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 17166589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
Louden JE; Skeem JL
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):449-70. PubMed ID: 17506086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Capital punishment views in China and the United States: a preliminary study among college students.
Jiang S; Lambert EG; Wang J
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2007 Feb; 51(1):84-97. PubMed ID: 17210658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Religious characteristics and the death penalty.
Miller MK; Hayward RD
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 17546480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense: scale construction and validation.
Daftary-Kapur T; Groscup JL; O'Connor M; Coffaro F; Galietta M
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(1):40-63. PubMed ID: 21264924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Venirepersons's attitudes toward the insanity defense: developing, refining, and validating a scale.
Skeem JL; Louden JE; Evans J
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):623-48. PubMed ID: 15732650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Death qualification and prejudice: the effect of implicit racism, sexism, and homophobia on capital defendants' right to due process.
Butler B
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):857-67. PubMed ID: 18046739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials.
Miller MK; Bornstein BH
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 17051441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When mitigation evidence makes a difference: effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials.
Barnett ME; Brodsky SL; Davis CM
Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):751-70. PubMed ID: 15386561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
Crocker CB; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?
Jung S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adolescents' attitudes toward the death penalty.
Lester D; Maggioncalda-Aretz M; Stark SH
Adolescence; 1997; 32(126):447-9. PubMed ID: 9179340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attitudes towards prisoners, as reported by prison inmates, prison employees and college students.
Kjelsberg E; Skoglund TH; Rustad AB
BMC Public Health; 2007 May; 7():71. PubMed ID: 17480213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Contributions of parental and social influences to cannabis use in a non-clinical sample of adolescents].
Chabrol H; Mabila JD; Chauchard E; Mantoulan R; Rousseau A
Encephale; 2008 Jan; 34(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 18514145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mental retardation and the death penalty: current status of exemption legislation.
Keyes DW; Edwards WJ
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1997; 21(5):687-96. PubMed ID: 9385803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of crime victimization and fear of crime on attitudes toward death penalty defendants.
Seltzer R; McCormick JP
Violence Vict; 1987; 2(2):99-114. PubMed ID: 3154161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Establishing mental retardation in capital cases: a potential matter of life and death.
Baroff GS
Ment Retard; 1991 Dec; 29(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 1775075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence of gender bias in legal insanity evaluations: a case vignette study of clinicians, judges and students.
Yourstone J; Lindholm T; Grann M; Svenson O
Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 18720232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AAPL and the death penalty: a historical perspective on the debate.
Gold LH
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 15809233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
