1002 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17166856)
1. Segmentation and intensity estimation of microarray images using a gamma-t mixture model.
Baek J; Son YS; McLachlan GJ
Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 17166856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving gene quantification by adjustable spot-image restoration.
Daskalakis A; Cavouras D; Bougioukos P; Kostopoulos S; Glotsos D; Kalatzis I; Kagadis GC; Argyropoulos C; Nikiforidis G
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2265-72. PubMed ID: 17599935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probabilistic segmentation and intensity estimation for microarray images.
Gottardo R; Besag J; Stephens M; Murua A
Biostatistics; 2006 Jan; 7(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 16049139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the performance of microarray segmentation algorithms.
Lehmussola A; Ruusuvuori P; Yli-Harja O
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2910-7. PubMed ID: 17032673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Donuts, scratches and blanks: robust model-based segmentation of microarray images.
Li Q; Fraley C; Bumgarner RE; Yeung KY; Raftery AE
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2875-82. PubMed ID: 15845656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intensity-based segmentation of microarray images.
Nagarajan R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 22(7):882-9. PubMed ID: 12906242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complementary DNA microarray image processing based on the fuzzy gaussian mixture model.
Athanasiadis EI; Cavouras DA; Spyridonos PP; Glotsos DT; Kalatzis IK; Nikiforidis GC
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jul; 13(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 19586811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Segmentation of cDNA microarray spots using markov random field modeling.
Demirkaya O; Asyali MH; Shoukri MM
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):2994-3000. PubMed ID: 15840703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of individual and ensemble majority vote cDNA microarray image segmentation schemes, originating from a spot-adjustable based restoration framework.
Daskalakis A; Glotsos D; Kostopoulos S; Cavouras D; Nikiforidis G
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jul; 95(1):72-88. PubMed ID: 19278747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collateral missing value imputation: a new robust missing value estimation algorithm for microarray data.
Sehgal MS; Gondal I; Dooley LS
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2417-23. PubMed ID: 15731210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Segmentation of cDNA microarray images by kernel density estimation.
Chen TB; Lu HH; Lee YS; Lan HJ
J Biomed Inform; 2008 Dec; 41(6):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18395494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The statistical distribution of the intensity of pixels within spots of DNA microarrays: what is the appropriate single-value representative?
Nuñez-Garcia J; Mersinias V; Cho KH; Smith CP; Wolkenhauer O
Appl Bioinformatics; 2003; 2(4):229-39. PubMed ID: 15130794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robust segmentation and analysis of DNA microarray spots using an adaptative split and merge algorithm.
Barra V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Feb; 81(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 16423425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A mixture model with random-effects components for clustering correlated gene-expression profiles.
Ng SK; McLachlan GJ; Wang K; Ben-Tovim Jones L; Ng SW
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1745-52. PubMed ID: 16675467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of background correction methods for two-colour microarrays.
Ritchie ME; Silver J; Oshlack A; Holmes M; Diyagama D; Holloway A; Smyth GK
Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 23(20):2700-7. PubMed ID: 17720982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A robust neural networks approach for spatial and intensity-dependent normalization of cDNA microarray data.
Tarca AL; Cooke JE; Mackay J
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2674-83. PubMed ID: 15797913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Background correction for cDNA microarray images using the TV+L1 model.
Yin W; Chen T; Zhou SX; Chakraborty A
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2410-6. PubMed ID: 15728112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MicroPreP: a cDNA microarray data pre-processing framework.
van Hijum SA; García de la Nava J; Trelles O; Kok J; Kuipers OP
Appl Bioinformatics; 2003; 2(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 15130795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian variable selection for the analysis of microarray data with censored outcomes.
Sha N; Tadesse MG; Vannucci M
Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2262-8. PubMed ID: 16845144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scanning microarrays at multiple intensities enhances discovery of differentially expressed genes.
Skibbe DS; Wang X; Zhao X; Borsuk LA; Nettleton D; Schnable PS
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1863-70. PubMed ID: 16731695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
