89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17167978)
1. A possible quality control protocol for Doppler ultrasound for organizational time optimization.
Di Nallo AM; Strigari L; Benassi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Sep; 25(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 17167978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of spectral Doppler flow and tissue velocity measurements in ultrasound systems.
Walker A; Olsson E; Wranne B; Ringqvist I; Ask P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 30(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 14962617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a sensitivity performance index test protocol and evaluation of colour Doppler sensitivity for a range of ultrasound scanners.
Browne JE; Watson AJ; Hoskins PR; Elliott AT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 30(11):1475-83. PubMed ID: 15588958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An audit of a hospital-based Doppler ultrasound quality control protocol using a commercial string Doppler phantom.
Cournane S; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):380-4. PubMed ID: 24156827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coded ultrasound for blood flow estimation using subband processing.
Gran F; Udesen J; Nielsen MB; Jensen JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2211-20. PubMed ID: 18986869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance testing of medical echo/Doppler equipment.
Thijssen JM; van Wijk MC; Cuypers MH
Eur J Ultrasound; 2002 Oct; 15(3):151-64. PubMed ID: 12423742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assurance of consistent peak-velocity measurements with a variety of duplex Doppler instruments.
Kimme-Smith C; Hussain R; Duerinckx A; Tessler F; Grant E
Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):265-72. PubMed ID: 2204967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Criteria and scheduling of quality control of B-mode and doppler ultrasonography equipment.
Balbis S; Meloni T; Tofani S; Zenone F; Nucera D; Guiot C
J Clin Ultrasound; 2012; 40(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 22359401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blood flow velocity measurements: a comparison of 25 clinical ultrasonographic units.
Groth DS; Zink FE; Felmlee JP; Kofler JM; James EM; Lindsey JR; Pavlicek W
J Ultrasound Med; 1995 Apr; 14(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 7602684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality control protocol for in vitro micro-computed tomography.
Stoico R; Tassani S; Perilli E; Baruffaldi F; Viceconti M
J Microsc; 2010 May; 238(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 20529063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The Doppler Simulator DS 81. A new calibration method for ultrasound-cw-Doppler blood flow measurement devices].
Reuter R; Trier HG
Ultraschall Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 6227994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of dead elements on the accuracy of Doppler ultrasound measurements.
Vachutka J; Dolezal L; Kollmann C; Klein J
Ultrason Imaging; 2014 Jan; 36(1):18-34. PubMed ID: 24275537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical Note: A new phantom design for routine testing of Doppler ultrasound.
Grice JV; Pickens DR; Price RR
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4431. PubMed ID: 27370158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulsed wave Doppler ultrasound: Accuracy, variability, and impact of acquisition parameters on flow measurements.
Russ MK; Lafata NM; Robertson SH; Samei E
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):6704-6713. PubMed ID: 37793117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Four-year experience with a clinical ultrasound quality control program.
Hangiandreou NJ; Stekel SF; Tradup DJ; Gorny KR; King DM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1350-7. PubMed ID: 21683511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Metrological problems in testing medical ultrasound equipment].
Eniakov AM
Med Tekh; 2001; (3):20-1. PubMed ID: 11515262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A test object for quality control of the instrument for doppler (duplex) ultrasonography, based on the Draft IEC 61685 Standard].
Kollmann C; Bezemer RA; Fredfeldt KE; Schaarschmidt UG; Teirlinck CJ
Ultraschall Med; 1999 Dec; 20(6):248-57. PubMed ID: 10670070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptance testing and quality control of gamma cameras, including SPECT.
Murphy PH
J Nucl Med; 1987 Jul; 28(7):1221-7. PubMed ID: 3496436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Results of a study of quality control of diagnostic ultrasound equipment].
Kollmann C
Ultraschall Med; 1995 Oct; 16(5):206-9. PubMed ID: 8533069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
