152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17168918)
1. Interlaboratory reproducibility of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: a national survey.
Confortini M; Di Bonito L; Carozzi F; Ghiringhello B; Montanari G; Parisio F; Prandi S;
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 17168918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atypical glandular cells in cervical smears: histological correlation and a suggested plan of management based on age of the patient in a low-resource setting.
Adhya AK; Mahesha V; Srinivasan R; Nijhawan R; Rajwanshi A; Suri V; Dhaliwal LK
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):375-9. PubMed ID: 19207306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
Liverani M; De Paola F; Danesi S; Fedriga R; Dalbuoni V; Agnoletti R; Amadori AR; Mirra F; Bonoli W; Saragoni L
Pathologica; 2006 Dec; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased diagnostic accuracy of atypical glandular cells in cervical liquid-based cytology using cell blocks.
Risse EK; Holierhoek JP; Meijer-Marres EM; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Boon ME
Cytopathology; 2011 Aug; 22(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 20726867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of digital images to evaluate the interobserver agreement on cervical smear readings in Italian cervical cancer screening.
Tinacci G; Biggeri A; Pellegrini A; Cariaggi MP; Schiboni ML; Confortini M
Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 20482719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consistency of reporting endocervical cells. An intralaboratory and interlaboratory assessment.
Mitchell H
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 8191817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atypical glandular cells: new Bethesda Terminology and Management Guidelines.
Levine L; Lucci JA; Dinh TV
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2003 Jun; 58(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 12775944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic implications of Pap smears classified as atypical glandular cells.
Haidopoulos DA; Stefanidis K; Rodolakis A; Pilalis A; Symiakaki I; Diakomanolis E
J Reprod Med; 2005 Jul; 50(7):539-42. PubMed ID: 16130853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease.
Ashfaq R; Gibbons D; Vela C; Saboorian MH; Iliya F
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 9987455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and histological significance of atypical glandular cell on Pap smear.
Behtash N; Nazari Z; Fakhrejahani F; Khafaf A; Azar EG
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 17261100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subdividing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance according to the Australian modified Bethesda, system: analysis of outcomes.
Roberts JM; Thurloe JK; Bowditch RC; Laverty CR
Cancer; 2000 Apr; 90(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 10794157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inadequate cervical smears: results of an educational slide exchange scheme. Trent Gynaecological Pathology Quality Assurance Group.
Cytopathology; 1999 Feb; 10(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10068883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidence of atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance in cervical cytology following introduction of the Bethesda System.
Eddy GL; Ural SH; Strumpf KB; Wojtowycz MA; Piraino PS; Mazur MT
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 9345356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of cytological features of glandular lesions of the cervix on conventional smear preparations-a comprehensive study from a tertiary care hospital.
Mantri S; Ravikumar G; Crasta J
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Mar; 49(3):388-394. PubMed ID: 33211413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions with coexisting squamous cell lesions.
van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15368313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Atypical glandular cells (AGC) on Papanicolaou smears--the great challenge of cervix screening programs].
Schneider F; Mágori A; Orosz Z; Pulay T
Orv Hetil; 2005 Oct; 146(44):2239-46. PubMed ID: 16302355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Problems encountered with the Bethesda System: the University of Iowa experience.
Bottles K; Reiter RC; Steiner AL; Zaleski S; Bedrossian CW; Johnson SR
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):410-4. PubMed ID: 1876375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
