These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17168935)

  • 1. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy.
    Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handling characteristics of a gallium alloy triturated with alcohol.
    Mash LK; Miller BH; Nakajima H; Guo IY; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 9590909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 1410252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of four dental amalgams over a two year period.
    van der Merwe WJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1992 Dec; 47(12):521-5. PubMed ID: 9511639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of gallium and amalgam alloys in primary molars.
    Singh R; Tandon S; Rakhee M
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Jun; 22(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 15491089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 3-year longitudinal, controlled clinical study of a gallium-based restorative material.
    Dunne SM; Abraham R; Pankhurst CL
    Br Dent J; 2005 Mar; 198(6):355-9; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 15789103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of four dental amalgams over a three year period.
    van der Merwe WJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jun; 48(6):329-32. PubMed ID: 9511601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of high-copper amalgams.
    Berry TG; Osborne JS; Summitt JB
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):122-4. PubMed ID: 8599586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloy compared with a high copper dental amalgam in a simulated clinical trial.
    Shaini FJ; Shortall AC; Ellakwa AE; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 11722719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces.
    Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents.
    van Dijken JW
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 1817352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gallium alloy versus high copper amalgam: a comparative evaluation of corrosion resistance and microleakage in the primary teeth.
    Munshi AK; Hegde AM; Bhaskar S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 11314418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Criteria for choice of an alloy for dental amalgams].
    De Valkeneer I; Bercy P
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990 Jun; 44(170):219-36. PubMed ID: 2088017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal seal composition in amalgam restored teeth of varying marginal leakage.
    Grossman ES; Witcomb MJ; Matejka JM
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1997 Mar; 52(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 9461907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A basic study on gallium alloys for dental restorations. Improvement of liquid gallium alloy].
    Yada I
    Fukuoka Shika Daigaku Gakkai Zasshi; 1989; 16(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 2488904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of setting time on the clinical performance of a high-copper amalgam alloy.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8700764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.