These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17168935)

  • 21. [A finely dispersed copper alloy for amalgams--a prospective filling material in pediatric dentistry. II. Clinical research].
    Pobochina VV; Chuev VP
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1994; 73(3):62-5. PubMed ID: 7846721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Handling characteristics of gallium alloy for dental restoration.
    Mash LK; Miller BH; Nakajima H; Collard SM; Guo IY; Okabe T
    J Dent; 1993 Dec; 21(6):350-4. PubMed ID: 8258585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Corrosion sealing of amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Mahler DB; Pham BV; Adey JD
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 19544821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical assessments of dental amalgam restorations.
    Mahler DB; Marantz RL
    Int Dent J; 1980 Dec; 30(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 6935163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy.
    Kiremitci A; Bolay S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 12787466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ
    J Dent Res; 1997 Nov; 76(11):1787-98. PubMed ID: 9372797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Direct-placement gallium restorative alloy: a 3-year clinical evaluation.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10323158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gallium alloy restorations in primary teeth: a 12-month study.
    Kaga M; Nakajima H; Sakai T; Oguchi H
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1195-200. PubMed ID: 8803395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A six-month clinical evaluation of polishing techniques on the marginal integrity of a high-copper alloy.
    Schmelitzer LD; Mayhew RB; Cowan RD; Voss JE
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1982; 61(5):17-9. PubMed ID: 6962253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Clinical and microstructural comparative studies on fillings made from gallium-tin-nickel alloys and from silver-tin amalgam].
    Gängler P; Hoyer I
    Stomatol DDR; 1977 Jun; 27(6):339-48. PubMed ID: 268699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal and internal adaptation of commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy cast restorations.
    Al Wazzan KA; Al-Nazzawi AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 17211501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Class II cavity for amalgam. Proposed new modifications related to material characteristics].
    Riccio C; Piccirillo P; Belnome G; Serpico R
    Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1990; 31(4):683-91. PubMed ID: 2100480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of recasting palladium-silver alloy on the fit of crowns with different marginal configurations.
    Lopes MB; Consani S; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):430-4. PubMed ID: 16275302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Gallium: an alternative for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; Davidson CL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Apr; 104(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 11924385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of the mechanical properties of a gallium-based alloy with a spherical high-copper amalgam.
    Shaini FJ; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2001 Mar; 17(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 11163384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanical properties and clinical performance of a gallium restorative material.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):241-5. PubMed ID: 8710706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term influences on marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 6585529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.