210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17169154)
1. Polychotomization of continuous variables in regression models based on the overall C index.
Tsuruta H; Bax L
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Dec; 6():41. PubMed ID: 17169154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
Hossain S; Gustafson P
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
Obuchowski NA
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating linear regression models in the presence of a censored independent variable.
Austin PC; Hoch JS
Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):411-29. PubMed ID: 14748036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic programming outperformed multivariable logistic regression in diagnosing pulmonary embolism.
Biesheuvel CJ; Siccama I; Grobbee DE; Moons KG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jun; 57(6):551-60. PubMed ID: 15246123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo methods in clinical research: applications in multivariable analysis.
Concato J; Feinstein AR
J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 9291696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of bias in MoM values on patient risk and screening performance for Down syndrome.
Nix B; Wright D; Baker A
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Sep; 27(9):840-5. PubMed ID: 17600858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of multiple regression to two latent variable techniques for estimation and prediction.
Wall MM; Li R
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(23):3671-85. PubMed ID: 14652868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semi-parametric ROC regression analysis with placement values.
Cai T
Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14744827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bootstrap model selection had similar performance for selecting authentic and noise variables compared to backward variable elimination: a simulation study.
Austin PC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1009-17.e1. PubMed ID: 18539429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selecting variables in non-parametric regression models for binary response. An application to the computerized detection of breast cancer.
Roca-Pardiñas J; Cadarso-Suárez C; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ
Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):240-59. PubMed ID: 18991258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of generalised additive models (GAM) in dentistry.
Helfenstein U; Steiner M; Menghini G
Community Dent Health; 1997 Dec; 14(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 9458579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Copula based prediction models: an application to an aortic regurgitation study.
Kumar P; Shoukri MM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():21. PubMed ID: 17573974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regression diagnostics for the class A regressive model with quantitative phenotypes.
Wang HM; Jones MP; Burns TL
Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(3):174-87. PubMed ID: 10446465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of clinical variables on predicting disease-free survival of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma.
Brookman-Amissah S; Kendel F; Spivak I; Pflanz S; Roigas J; Klotz T; May M
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(10):1375-80. PubMed ID: 19040527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods for categorizing a prognostic variable in a multivariable setting.
Mazumdar M; Smith A; Bacik J
Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 12590414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating predictive values for blood pressure measurements from multivariate regression models with covariates.
Cook NR
Stat Med; 1996 Oct; 15(19):2013-28. PubMed ID: 8896136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endogeneity bias in the absence of unobserved heterogeneity.
Berg GD; Mansley EC
Ann Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 14(8):561-5. PubMed ID: 15350955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
