173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17170740)
1. Evaluation of Phi29-based whole-genome amplification for microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation.
Arriola E; Lambros MB; Jones C; Dexter T; Mackay A; Tan DS; Tamber N; Fenwick K; Ashworth A; Dowsett M; Reis-Filho JS
Lab Invest; 2007 Jan; 87(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 17170740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Challenges in array comparative genomic hybridization for the analysis of cancer samples.
Nowak NJ; Miecznikowski J; Moore SR; Gaile D; Bobadilla D; Smith DD; Kernstine K; Forman SJ; Mhawech-Fauceglia P; Reid M; Stoler D; Loree T; Rigual N; Sullivan M; Weiss LM; Hicks D; Slovak ML
Genet Med; 2007 Sep; 9(9):585-95. PubMed ID: 17873646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of whole genome amplified (WGA) DNA for use in genotyping assay development.
Han T; Chang CW; Kwekel JC; Chen Y; Ge Y; Martinez-Murillo F; Roscoe D; Težak Z; Philip R; Bijwaard K; Fuscoe JC
BMC Genomics; 2012 Jun; 13():217. PubMed ID: 22655855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Precision oncology using a limited number of cells: optimization of whole genome amplification products for sequencing applications.
Sho S; Court CM; Winograd P; Lee S; Hou S; Graeber TG; Tseng HR; Tomlinson JS
BMC Cancer; 2017 Jul; 17(1):457. PubMed ID: 28666423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A procedure for highly specific, sensitive, and unbiased whole-genome amplification.
Pan X; Urban AE; Palejev D; Schulz V; Grubert F; Hu Y; Snyder M; Weissman SM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Oct; 105(40):15499-504. PubMed ID: 18832167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole genome amplification and its impact on CGH array profiles.
Talseth-Palmer BA; Bowden NA; Hill A; Meldrum C; Scott RJ
BMC Res Notes; 2008 Jul; 1():56. PubMed ID: 18710509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH.
Lage JM; Leamon JH; Pejovic T; Hamann S; Lacey M; Dillon D; Segraves R; Vossbrinck B; González A; Pinkel D; Albertson DG; Costa J; Lizardi PM
Genome Res; 2003 Feb; 13(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 12566408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gene-resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using oligonucleotide expression microarrays.
Auer H; Newsom DL; Nowak NJ; McHugh KM; Singh S; Yu CY; Yang Y; Wenger GD; Gastier-Foster JM; Kornacker K
BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():111. PubMed ID: 17470268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amplification of whole tumor genomes and gene-by-gene mapping of genomic aberrations from limited sources of fresh-frozen and paraffin-embedded DNA.
Bredel M; Bredel C; Juric D; Kim Y; Vogel H; Harsh GR; Recht LD; Pollack JR; Sikic BI
J Mol Diagn; 2005 May; 7(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 15858140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of whole genome amplification-induced bias through high-throughput, massively parallel whole genome sequencing.
Pinard R; de Winter A; Sarkis GJ; Gerstein MB; Tartaro KR; Plant RN; Egholm M; Rothberg JM; Leamon JH
BMC Genomics; 2006 Aug; 7():216. PubMed ID: 16928277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of whole genome amplification on analysis of copy number variants.
Pugh TJ; Delaney AD; Farnoud N; Flibotte S; Griffith M; Li HI; Qian H; Farinha P; Gascoyne RD; Marra MA
Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Aug; 36(13):e80. PubMed ID: 18559357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple displacement amplification as an aid in checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.
Teles F; Haffajee AD; Socransky SS
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2007 Apr; 22(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 17311635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of 3 methods of whole-genome amplification for subsequent metaphase comparative genomic hybridization.
Ng G; Roberts I; Coleman N
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2005 Dec; 14(4):203-12. PubMed ID: 16319690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the efficacy of constitutional array-based comparative genomic hybridization in the diagnosis of aneuploidy using genomic and amplified DNA.
Tan NH; Palmer R; Wang R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 20178523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of DOP-PCR amplification of DNA for high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
Larsen J; Ottesen AM; Lundsteen C; Leffers H; Larsen JK
Cytometry; 2001 Aug; 44(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 11500848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Copy Number Variation Analysis by Array Analysis of Single Cells Following Whole Genome Amplification.
Dimitriadou E; Zamani Esteki M; Vermeesch JR
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1347():197-219. PubMed ID: 26374319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coupling amplified DNA from flow-sorted chromosomes to high-density SNP mapping in barley.
Simková H; Svensson JT; Condamine P; Hribová E; Suchánková P; Bhat PR; Bartos J; Safár J; Close TJ; Dolezel J
BMC Genomics; 2008 Jun; 9():294. PubMed ID: 18565235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of whole genome amplification methods for detecting pathogenic bacterial genomic DNA using microarray.
Uda A; Tanabayashi K; Fujita O; Hotta A; Yamamoto Y; Yamada A
Jpn J Infect Dis; 2007 Nov; 60(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 18032834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phi29 polymerase based random amplification of viral RNA as an alternative to random RT-PCR.
Berthet N; Reinhardt AK; Leclercq I; van Ooyen S; Batéjat C; Dickinson P; Stamboliyska R; Old IG; Kong KA; Dacheux L; Bourhy H; Kennedy GC; Korfhage C; Cole ST; Manuguerra JC
BMC Mol Biol; 2008 Sep; 9():77. PubMed ID: 18771595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Whole Genome Amplification by Isothermal Multiple Strand Displacement Using Phi29 DNA Polymerase.
Kroneis T; El-Heliebi A
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1347():111-7. PubMed ID: 26374313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
