BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17173288)

  • 1. Steiner minimal trees, twist angles, and the protein folding problem.
    Smith JM; Jang Y; Kim MK
    Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):889-902. PubMed ID: 17173288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A reduced protein model with accurate native-structure identification ability.
    Betancourt MR
    Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):889-907. PubMed ID: 14635131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rotamers: to be or not to be? An analysis of amino acid side-chain conformations in globular proteins.
    Schrauber H; Eisenhaber F; Argos P
    J Mol Biol; 1993 Mar; 230(2):592-612. PubMed ID: 8464066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Entropy capacity determines protein folding.
    Galzitskaya OV; Garbuzynskiy SO
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 16400647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the role of the topology in protein folding by computational inverse folding experiments.
    Mucherino A; Costantini S; di Serafino D; D'Apuzzo M; Facchiano A; Colonna G
    Comput Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 32(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 18479970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Huang ES; Subbiah S; Tsai J; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Apr; 257(3):716-25. PubMed ID: 8648635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination of near-native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions.
    Gatchell DW; Dennis S; Vajda S
    Proteins; 2000 Dec; 41(4):518-34. PubMed ID: 11056039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognizing native folds by the arrangement of hydrophobic and polar residues.
    Huang ES; Subbiah S; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1995 Oct; 252(5):709-20. PubMed ID: 7563083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct correlation between proteins' folding rates and their amino acid compositions: an ab initio folding rate prediction.
    Ma BG; Guo JX; Zhang HY
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(2):362-72. PubMed ID: 16937389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical potential function for simplified protein models: combining contact and local sequence-structure descriptors.
    Zhang J; Chen R; Liang J
    Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):949-60. PubMed ID: 16477624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from secondary structures using optimized potentials.
    Hoang TX; Seno F; Banavar JR; Cieplak M; Maritan A
    Proteins; 2003 Aug; 52(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 12833540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of protein-folding pathways by reduced-space modeling.
    Kmiecik S; Kolinski A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(30):12330-5. PubMed ID: 17636132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Large-scale prediction of protein geometry and stability changes for arbitrary single point mutations.
    Bordner AJ; Abagyan RA
    Proteins; 2004 Nov; 57(2):400-13. PubMed ID: 15340927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hydrophobic moments of protein structures: spatially profiling the distribution.
    Silverman BD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Apr; 98(9):4996-5001. PubMed ID: 11309489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Routes are trees: the parsing perspective on protein folding.
    Hockenmaier J; Joshi AK; Dill KA
    Proteins; 2007 Jan; 66(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 17063473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential and force for discrimination of native structures from decoys.
    Mirzaie M; Eslahchi C; Pezeshk H; Sadeghi M
    Proteins; 2009 Nov; 77(2):454-63. PubMed ID: 19452553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective connectivity profile: a structural representation that evidences the relationship between protein structures and sequences.
    Bastolla U; Ortíz AR; Porto M; Teichert F
    Proteins; 2008 Dec; 73(4):872-88. PubMed ID: 18536008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimalist representations and the importance of nearest neighbor effects in protein folding simulations.
    Colubri A; Jha AK; Shen MY; Sali A; Berry RS; Sosnick TR; Freed KF
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Nov; 363(4):835-57. PubMed ID: 16982067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem.
    Mirny LA; Shakhnovich EI
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Dec; 264(5):1164-79. PubMed ID: 9000638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.