BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17173735)

  • 1. [Influence of diameter of optical zone ablation on LASIK-induced higher order optical aberrations in myopia].
    Cheng ZY; Chu RY; Zhou XT
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 42(9):772-6. PubMed ID: 17173735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishing analysis parameters for spherical aberration after wavefront LASIK.
    Hiatt JA; Grant CN; Boxer Wachler BS
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jun; 112(6):998-1002. PubMed ID: 15936440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18775529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conservation of corneal tissue with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Lee DH; Oh JR; Reinstein DZ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jun; 31(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 16039489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of pupil diameter on the relation between ocular higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Oshika T; Tokunaga T; Samejima T; Miyata K; Kawana K; Kaji Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 47(4):1334-8. PubMed ID: 16565365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Yamane N; Miyata K; Samejima T; Hiraoka T; Kiuchi T; Okamoto F; Hirohara Y; Mihashi T; Oshika T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Nov; 45(11):3986-90. PubMed ID: 15505046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after LASEK with a 6.0 mm ablation zone and a 6.5 mm ablation zone with blend zone.
    Seo KY; Lee JB; Kang JJ; Lee ES; Kim EK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):653-7. PubMed ID: 15050263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of corneal higher-order aberrations induced by myopic and hyperopic LASIK.
    Kohnen T; Mahmoud K; Bühren J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Oct; 112(10):1692. PubMed ID: 16140381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Influence of corneal refractive surgery on wavefront aberrations of human eye].
    Jin HY; Wang QM; Wang DM; Meng JT
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 39(6):328-34. PubMed ID: 12895360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting the change in lower-order and higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia with the Zyoptix 3.1 system.
    Bühren J; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1166-74. PubMed ID: 16857504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of pupil and optical zone diameter on higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK.
    Bühren J; Kühne C; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Dec; 31(12):2272-80. PubMed ID: 16473217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements.
    Marcos S; Barbero S; Llorente L; Merayo-Lloves J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Dec; 42(13):3349-56. PubMed ID: 11726644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ocular higher-order aberrations features analysis after corneal refractive surgery.
    Wang Y; Zhao KX; He JC; Jin Y; Zuo T
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Feb; 120(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 17374275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional optical zone after myopic LASIK as a function of ablation diameter.
    Nepomuceno RL; Boxer Wachler BS; Scruggs R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Feb; 31(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 15767162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
    Kalyvianaki MI; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Panagopoulou SI; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration.
    Zhang J; Zhou YH; Wang NL; Li R
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Jan; 121(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 18272040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia.
    Pop M; Payette Y
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 14711706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of an aspheric treatment algorithm in decreasing induced spherical aberration after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Ang RE; Chan WK; Wee TL; Lee HM; Bunnapradist P; Cox I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1348-57. PubMed ID: 19631119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.
    Padmanabhan P; Mrochen M; Basuthkar S; Viswanathan D; Joseph R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18299062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of postoperative wavefront aberrations after NIDEK CXIII optimized aspheric transition zone treatment and OPD-guided custom aspheric treatment.
    Hantera M
    J Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 25(10 Suppl):S922-6. PubMed ID: 19848371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.