These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17174662)

  • 1. Impact of water quality on setting of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.
    Bradna P; Cerna D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 17174662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial moulage: the effect of a retarder on compressive strength and working and setting times of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Lemon JC; Okay DJ; Powers JM; Martin JW; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 12942062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials.
    Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
    Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Fundamental studies of elastic impression materials (part III). Viscoelastic properties from start of mix for alginate impression materials (author's transl)].
    Inoue K; Kakigawa H; Matsushita S; Yamada S; Hayashi I
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1978 Jan; 19(45):48-52. PubMed ID: 282376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional accuracy of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid alternative impression materials with immediate and delayed pouring.
    Nassar U; Hussein B; Oko A; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2012; 78():c2. PubMed ID: 22322019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working time of elastomeric impression materials: relevance of rheological tests.
    Balkenhol M; Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Wöstmann B
    Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 18269123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between pH changes and dimensional stability in irreversible hydrocolloid impression material during setting.
    Anastassiadou V; Dolopoulou V; Kaloyannides A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 8595113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of metal primers on bond strength of resin cements to base metals.
    Fonseca RG; de Almeida JG; Haneda IG; Adabo GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 19328279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with chlorinated compounds.
    Rweyendela IH; Patel M; Owen CP
    SADJ; 2009 Jun; 64(5):208, 210-2. PubMed ID: 19725332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention strength of impression materials to a tray material using different adhesive methods: an in vitro study.
    Marafie Y; Looney S; Nelson S; Chan D; Browning W; Rueggeberg F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 19033027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.