285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17174683)
1. A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium rotary systems.
Al-Sudani D; Al-Shahrani S
J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1198-201. PubMed ID: 17174683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of shaft design on the shaping ability of 3 nickel-titanium rotary systems by means of spiral computerized tomography.
Versiani MA; Pascon EA; de Sousa CJ; Borges MA; Sousa-Neto MD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 18424117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
Ayar LR; Love RM
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sealer area associated with cold lateral condensation of gutta-percha and warm coated carrier filling systems in canals prepared with various rotary NiTi systems.
Gulsahi K; Cehreli ZC; Kuraner T; Dagli FT
Int Endod J; 2007 Apr; 40(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 17309742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability.
Williamson AE; Sandor AJ; Justman BC
J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 19084136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction.
Chuste-Guillot MP; Badet C; Peli JF; Perez F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 16876071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variability of the diameter and taper of size #30, 0.04 nickel-titanium rotary files.
Lask JT; Walker MP; Kulild JC; Cunningham KP; Shull PA
J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1171-3. PubMed ID: 17174675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
