These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17174683)

  • 21. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
    Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the shaping ability of RaCe and FlexMaster rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals.
    Merrett SJ; Bryant ST; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):960-2. PubMed ID: 16982273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments on preparing curved canals in posterior teeth.
    Wei X; Ling J; Zhang S
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Sep; 37(5):333-5. PubMed ID: 12425841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
    Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments in a simulated apical abrupt curvature.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Melo MC; Bahia MG; Testarelli L; Gambarini G
    Int Endod J; 2010 Mar; 43(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 20158534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of air-driven vs electric torque control motors on canal centering ability by ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Zarei M; Javidi M; Erfanian M; Lomee M; Afkhami F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 23579897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Ciftçioğlu E; Ozkarsli SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e86-93. PubMed ID: 20416526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
    Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
    J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A scanning electron microscopy evaluation of microfractures, deformation and separation in EndoSequence and Profile nickel-titanium rotary files using an extracted molar tooth model.
    Herold KS; Johnson BR; Wenckus CS
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):712-4. PubMed ID: 17509412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
    J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars.
    Ankrum MT; Hartwell GR; Truitt JE
    J Endod; 2004 Apr; 30(4):234-7. PubMed ID: 15085054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Zhang L; Luo HX; Zhou XD; Tan H; Huang DM
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):456-8. PubMed ID: 18358896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
    Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Debris retention and wear in three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Elmsallati EA; Wadachi R; Ebrahim AK; Suda H
    Aust Endod J; 2006 Dec; 32(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 17201751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of LightSpeed LS1 and LightSpeed LSX NiTi rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in simulated root canals.
    Iqbal MK; Banfield B; Lavorini A; Bachstein B
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 17320711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of a brushing working motion on the fatigue life of NiTi rotary instruments.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Sorci E; Malagnino VA; Somma F
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jan; 40(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 17209832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.