BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17174795)

  • 21. Computer error and acceptable standards for electrocardiographic interpretation.
    Spodick DH
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):348-9. PubMed ID: 16697395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Draft guidelines for radiopharmacy.
    EANM
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Aug; 30(8):BP63-72. PubMed ID: 14552340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Statement on mobile and remote-site provision of nuclear cardiology imaging services. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
    Bateman TM; Stowers SA; Herndon WM
    J Nucl Cardiol; 1997; 4(2 Pt 1):174-7. PubMed ID: 9115072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantifying radiation safety and quality in medical imaging, part 3: the quality assurance scorecard.
    Reiner BI
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Oct; 6(10):694-700. PubMed ID: 19800588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Utility of medical data registries.
    Morin RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1191. PubMed ID: 25444071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. American Board of Radiology Perspective on Maintenance of Certification: Part IV--Practice Quality Improvement for Diagnostic Radiology.
    Strife JL; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Dunnick NR; Bosma J; Hattery RR
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 17495291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ACCF/AHA methodology for the development of quality measures for cardiovascular technology: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.
    Bonow RO; Douglas PS; Buxton AE; Cohen DJ; Curtis JP; Delong E; Drozda JP; Ferguson TB; Heidenreich PA; Hendel RC; Masoudi FA; Peterson ED; Taylor AJ; ;
    Circulation; 2011 Sep; 124(13):1483-502. PubMed ID: 21875906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improving quality in echocardiography laboratories.
    Pearlman AS; Gardin JM
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Jan; 24(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 21172595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Standardization in radiology--protocols, procedures, and reports: best for patients and providers.
    Ellenbogen PH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Sep; 10(9):641. PubMed ID: 23910383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evidence for diagnostic imaging guidelines.
    Reed MH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):325-6. PubMed ID: 24889477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for quality echocardiography laboratory operations.
    Picard MH; Adams D; Bierig SM; Dent JM; Douglas PS; Gillam LD; Keller AM; Malenka DJ; Masoudi FA; McCulloch M; Pellikka PA; Peters PJ; Stainback RF; Strachan GM; Zoghbi WA;
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Jan; 24(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21172594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measuring quality in electrophysiology.
    Friedman DJ; Al-Khatib SM
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 47(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 26936264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. NEC: some coincidences are more equivalent than others.
    Badawi RD; Dahlbom M
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Nov; 46(11):1767-8. PubMed ID: 16269587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.
    Parikh J; Fanus D
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):854-60. PubMed ID: 17411717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The American Board of Radiology perspective on maintenance of certification: part IV--practice quality improvement in diagnostic radiology.
    Strife JL; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Dunnick NR; Bosma J; Hattery RR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):300-4. PubMed ID: 17467612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What are your goals for peer review? A framework for understanding differing methods.
    Fotenos A; Nagy P
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Dec; 9(12):929-30. PubMed ID: 23206652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Practical points for nuclear cardiology.
    Peace RA; Lloyd JJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 13(5):731; author reply 731-2. PubMed ID: 16945756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ergonomics brings accuracy to quality control.
    Med Device Technol; 2005 Apr; 16(3):40. PubMed ID: 15871424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A dynamic renal phantom for nuclear medicine studies.
    SabbirAhmed AS; Demir M; Kabasakal L; Uslu I
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):530-8. PubMed ID: 15789599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ACCF/AHA clinical practice guideline methodology summit report: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
    Jacobs AK; Kushner FG; Ettinger SM; Guyton RA; Anderson JL; Ohman EM; Albert NM; Antman EM; Arnett DK; Bertolet M; Bhatt DL; Brindis RG; Creager MA; DeMets DL; Dickersin K; Fonarow GC; Gibbons RJ; Halperin JL; Hochman JS; Koster MA; Normand SL; Ortiz E; Peterson ED; Roach WH; Sacco RL; Smith SC; Stevenson WG; Tomaselli GF; Yancy CW; Zoghbi WA; Harold JG; He Y; Mangu PB; Qaseem A; Sayre MR; Somerfield MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 61(2):213-65. PubMed ID: 23238451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.