BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

814 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17175425)

  • 1. The effect of injection of two vs 10 mL saline on the subsequent spread and quality of epidural analgesia in parturients.
    Siddik-Sayyid SM; Taha SK; Aouad MT; Daaboul DG; Deeb PG; El Khatib MF; Baraka AS
    J Clin Anesth; 2006 Dec; 18(8):575-9. PubMed ID: 17175425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of epidural vs intravenous analgesia for posterior spinal fusion surgery.
    O'Hara JF; Cywinski JB; Tetzlaff JE; Xu M; Gurd AR; Andrish JT
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2004 Dec; 14(12):1009-15. PubMed ID: 15601351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incisional and epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical study.
    Ranta PO; Ala-Kokko TI; Kukkonen JE; Ohtonen PP; Raudaskoski TH; Reponen PK; Rawal N
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2006 Jul; 15(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 16798442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intravenous remifentanil vs. epidural levobupivacaine with fentanyl for pain relief in early labour: a randomised, controlled, double-blinded study.
    Volmanen P; Sarvela J; Akural EI; Raudaskoski T; Korttila K; Alahuhta S
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2008 Feb; 52(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 18005381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epidural saline solution prior to local anaesthetic produces differential nerve block.
    Okutomi T; Hoka S
    Can J Anaesth; 1998 Nov; 45(11):1091-3. PubMed ID: 10021958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia vs. intermittent bolus epidural analgesia for pain relief after major abdominal surgery. A prospective, randomised, double-blind clinical trial.
    Stamenkovic DM; Geric V; Slavkovic Z; Raskovic J; Djordjevic M
    Int J Clin Pract; 2008 Feb; 62(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 18028385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to epidural analgesia after thoracic surgery.
    Wahlander S; Frumento RJ; Wagener G; Saldana-Ferretti B; Joshi RR; Playford HR; Sladen RN
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2005 Oct; 19(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 16202898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase the risk of instrumental and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women?
    Aneiros F; Vazquez M; Valiño C; Taboada M; Sabaté S; Otero P; Costa J; Carceller J; Vázquez R; Díaz-Vieito M; Rodríguez A; Alvarez J
    J Clin Anesth; 2009 Mar; 21(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 19329011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia.
    Hepner DL; Gaiser RR; Cheek TG; Gutsche BB
    Can J Anaesth; 2000 Mar; 47(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 10730733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion.
    Lim Y; Sia AT; Ocampo C
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2005 Oct; 14(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 16154735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bupivacaine with meperidine versus bupivacaine with fentanyl for continuous epidural labor analgesia.
    Massad IM; Khadra MM; Alkazaleh FA; Qatawneh AM; Saleh SS; Abu-Halaweh SA
    Saudi Med J; 2007 Jun; 28(6):904-8. PubMed ID: 17530108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bupivacaine versus L-bupivacaine for labor analgesia via combined spinal-epidural: a randomized, double-blinded study.
    Sah N; Vallejo MC; Ramanathan S; Golebiewski K
    J Clin Anesth; 2005 Mar; 17(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 15809123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-controlled epidural technique improves analgesia for labor but increases cesarean delivery rate compared with the intermittent bolus technique.
    Halonen P; Sarvela J; Saisto T; Soikkeli A; Halmesmäki E; Korttila K
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 Jul; 48(6):732-7. PubMed ID: 15196106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extending low-dose epidural analgesia in labour for emergency Caesarean section - a comparison of levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl.
    Malhotra S; Yentis SM
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):667-71. PubMed ID: 17567341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine for labor epidural analgesia.
    Sah N; Vallejo M; Phelps A; Finegold H; Mandell G; Ramanathan S
    J Clin Anesth; 2007 May; 19(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 17531731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor pain: best timing of epidural infusion following spinal dose.
    Okutomi T; Saito M; Mochizuki J; Kuczkowski KM
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Mar; 279(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 18629529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of epidural volume extension on spinal block with hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine for Caesarean delivery.
    Kucukguclu S; Unlugenc H; Gunenc F; Kuvaki B; Gokmen N; Gunasti S; Guclu S; Yilmaz F; Isik G
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Apr; 25(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 17888192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regression of sensory and motor blockade, and analgesia during continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine and fentanyl in comparison with other local anesthetics.
    Kanai A; Osawa S; Suzuki A; Ozawa A; Okamoto H; Hoka S
    Pain Med; 2007; 8(7):546-53. PubMed ID: 17883739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extending low-dose epidural analgesia for emergency Caesarean section using ropivacaine 0.75%.
    Sanders RD; Mallory S; Lucas DN; Chan T; Yeo S; Yentis SM
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Oct; 59(10):988-92. PubMed ID: 15488058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomised double-blind comparison of epidural fentanyl versus fentanyl and bupivicaine for pain relief in the second stage of labour.
    Lindow SW; Dhillon AR; Husaini SW; Russell IF
    BJOG; 2004 Oct; 111(10):1075-80. PubMed ID: 15383109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.