178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17175468)
1. Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.
Cheng SY; Chen TC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 45(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17175468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol use for induction of labour at term.
Abbassi RM; Sirichand P; Rizvi S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Oct; 18(10):625-9. PubMed ID: 18940120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Ewert K; Powers B; Robertson S; Alfirevic Z
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17077234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol solution between nulliparous and multiparous women.
Cheng SY; Hsue CS; Hwang GH; Chen W; Li TC
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20178530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison between 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
Srisomboon J; Singchai S
J Med Assoc Thai; 1998 Oct; 81(10):779-83. PubMed ID: 9803069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.
Uludag S; Salihoglu Saricali F; Madazli R; Cepni I
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Sep; 122(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 15951101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z
BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A
BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in unfavourable cervix in 3rd trimester.
Abbasi N; Danish N; Shakoor F; Parveen Z; Bilal SA
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 19610511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
