These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17175514)

  • 1. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
    Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
    Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
    Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Balancing speech intelligibility versus sound exposure in selection of personal hearing protection equipment for Chinook aircrews.
    Van Wijngaarden SJ; Rots G
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1037-44. PubMed ID: 11718509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of hearing protection devices on speech intelligibility of Persian employees.
    Karami M; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Hamidi Nahrani M
    BMC Res Notes; 2020 Nov; 13(1):529. PubMed ID: 33176877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation by industrial workers of passive and level-dependent hearing protection devices.
    Tufts JB; Hamilton MA; Ucci AJ; Rubas J
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):26-36. PubMed ID: 21173484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Communication and noise. Speech intelligibility of airplane pilots with and without active noise compensation].
    Matschke RG
    HNO; 1994 Aug; 42(8):499-504. PubMed ID: 7960953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A study on the hearing protection and intervention effects of silicone earplug usage among manufacturing workers].
    Liu XX; Zhong X; Zhang YY; Li ZP; Su SB; Zhang MB
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Jun; 42(6):442-446. PubMed ID: 38964908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The challenge of localizing vehicle backup alarms: effects of passive and electronic hearing protectors, ambient noise level, and backup alarm spectral content.
    Alali KA; Casali JG
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):99-112. PubMed ID: 21368435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A self-controlled trial to evaluate the use of active hearing defenders in the engine rooms of operational naval vessels.
    Ong M; Choo JT; Low E
    Singapore Med J; 2004 Feb; 45(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 14985846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Protection for noise-induced hearing loss using active hearing protection systems].
    Matschke RG; Lehnert H; Veit I; Andresen U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Nov; 70(11):586-93. PubMed ID: 1755896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses.
    Schulz TY
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):152-62. PubMed ID: 21368441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.