These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17176661)

  • 61. Implicit association measurement with the IAT: evidence for effects of executive control processes.
    Mierke J; Klauer KC
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):107-22. PubMed ID: 11392979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The Brief Implicit Association Test.
    Sriram N; Greenwald AG
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(4):283-94. PubMed ID: 19439401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Application of the implicit association test to a study on deception.
    Frost P; Adie M; Denomme R; Lahaie A; Sibley A; Smith E
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 20518438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The palm IAT: a portable version of the implicit association task.
    Dabbs JM; Bassett JF; Dyomina NV
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 Feb; 35(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 12723783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Measurement of Mood States Following Light Alcohol Consumption: Evidence from the Implicit Association Test.
    Ito M; Matsuzaki N; Kawahara J
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2018 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 30177640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. It's brief but is it better? An evaluation of the Brief Implicit Association Test.
    Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 20413375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Using the Implicit Association Test as a measure of causal learning does not eliminate effects of rule learning.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 20178964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A reaction time paradigm to assess (implicit) complaint-specific dysfunctional beliefs.
    de Jong PJ; Pasman W; Kindt M; van den Hout MA
    Behav Res Ther; 2001 Jan; 39(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 11125719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: the role of similarity construction.
    Bading K; Stahl C; Rothermund K
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Feb; 34(1):128-143. PubMed ID: 30999813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Trying to separate the wheat from the chaff: Construct- and faking-related variance on the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Röhner J; Ewers T
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):243-58. PubMed ID: 25701107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The power of a story: new, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario.
    Foroni F; Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 15948288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Positive associations primacy in the IAT: a many-facet rasch measurement analysis.
    Anselmi P; Vianello M; Robusto E
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 21592938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. An ontological test of the IAT: Self-activation can increase predictive validity.
    Perugini M; O'Gorman R; Prestwich A
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 17472097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Should We Stop Looking for a Better Scoring Algorithm for Handling Implicit Association Test Data? Test of the Role of Errors, Extreme Latencies Treatment, Scoring Formula, and Practice Trials on Reliability and Validity.
    Richetin J; Costantini G; Perugini M; Schönbrodt F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129601. PubMed ID: 26107176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Does discrimination beat association in the IAT? The discrimination-association model reconceived.
    Stefanutti L; Robusto E; Vianello M; Anselmi P; Dalla Rosa A; Bar-Anan Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1640-1656. PubMed ID: 32162277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A discrimination-association model for decomposing component processes of the implicit association test.
    Stefanutti L; Robusto E; Vianello M; Anselmi P
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):393-404. PubMed ID: 23239064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. On the logic of testing the independence assumption in the process-dissociation procedure.
    Hirshman E
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):857-9. PubMed ID: 9796221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Causal asymmetry across cultures: assigning causal roles in symmetric physical settings.
    Bender A; Beller S
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():231. PubMed ID: 21960982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Reciprocal associations between implicit attitudes and drinking in emerging adulthood.
    Paige KJ; Weigard A; Colder CR
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2022 Feb; 46(2):277-288. PubMed ID: 35152465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Reduction of implicit cognitive bias with cathodal tDCS to the left prefrontal cortex.
    Schroeder PA; Nuerk HC; Plewnia C
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 18(2):263-272. PubMed ID: 29380294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.