BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17176781)

  • 1. A comparison of two single-headed and two multi-headed allergen skin test devices.
    Yoon IK; Martin BL; Carr WW; ;
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2006; 27(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 17176781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance and Pain Tolerability of Current Diagnostic Allergy Skin Prick Test Devices.
    Tversky JR; Chelladurai Y; McGready J; Hamilton RG
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2015; 3(6):888-93. PubMed ID: 26553615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of test devices for skin prick testing.
    Carr WW; Martin B; Howard RS; Cox L; Borish L;
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Aug; 116(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 16108145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and Skintestor Omni allergy skin test devices.
    Dykewicz MS; Lemmon JK; Keaney DL
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2007 Jun; 98(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 17601269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and ComforTen allergy skin test devices.
    Dykewicz MS; Dooms KT; Chassaing DL
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2011; 32(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 21703099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two disposable plastic skin test devices with the bifurcated needle for epicutaneous allergy testing.
    Corder WT; Hogan MB; Wilson NW
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Sep; 77(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 8814048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pain perception and performance of three devices for single-site allergen skin testing.
    Nelson HS; Lopez P; Curran-Everett D
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2014; 35(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 24433598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A pilot study of the validation of percutaneous testing in cats.
    Rossi MA; Messinger L; Olivry T; Hoontrakoon R
    Vet Dermatol; 2013 Oct; 24(5):488-e115. PubMed ID: 23826630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of multiheaded devices for allergy skin testing.
    Nelson HS; Kolehmainen C; Lahr J; Murphy J; Buchmeier A
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Jun; 113(6):1218-9. PubMed ID: 15214360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of allergy skin testing.
    Shtessel M; Tversky J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2018 Jan; 120(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 29273134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative performance of five commercial prick skin test devices.
    Nelson HS; Rosloniec DM; McCall LI; Iklé D
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1993 Nov; 92(5):750-6. PubMed ID: 8227867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing.
    Nelson HS; Lahr J; Buchmeier A; McCormick D
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1998 Feb; 101(2 Pt 1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9500746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Multi-Test device for immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
    Berkowitz RB; Tinkelman DG; Lutz C; Crummie A; Smith K
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1992 Dec; 90(6 Pt 1):979-85. PubMed ID: 1460201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Allergen skin prick test should be adjusted by the histamine reactivity.
    Dreborg S
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2015; 166(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 25765942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of intradermal dilutional testing with the Multi-Test II applicator in testing for mold allergy.
    Peltier J; Ryan MW
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Feb; 134(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 16455371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of methods for the estimation of threshold concentrations by the skin prick test.
    Dreborg S; Holgersson M
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2015; 166(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 25765858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of six epicutaneous devices in the performance of immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
    Adinoff AD; Rosloniec DM; McCall LL; Nelson HS
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Aug; 84(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 2760359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of three methods for using the Duotip-Test device for skin testing.
    Sangsupawanich P; Chamnanphol S; Koonrungsrisomboon D
    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2000 Sep; 18(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11270470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histamine and allergen skin reactivity in the elderly population: results from the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging.
    Song WJ; Lee SM; Kim MH; Kim SH; Kim KW; Cho SH; Min KU; Chang YS
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2011 Oct; 107(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 21962095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal skin prick wheal size for diagnosis of cat allergy.
    Zarei M; Remer CF; Kaplan MS; Staveren AM; Lin CK; Razo E; Goldberg B
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2004 Jun; 92(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 15237761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.