These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

768 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17177581)

  • 1. Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir in antiretroviral-naive patients: modelling the combined effects of HIV and heart disease.
    Simpson KN; Luo MP; Chumney EC; King MS; Brun S
    Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 17177581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the UK, France, Italy and Spain.
    Simpson KN; Jones WJ; Rajagopalan R; Dietz B
    Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(12):807-17. PubMed ID: 18020538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the US.
    Simpson KN; Jones WJ; Rajagopalan R; Dietz B
    Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(7):443-52. PubMed ID: 17563124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) comparison of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV+RTV) based regimens for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and -experienced United Kingdom patients in 2011.
    Simpson KN; Baran RW; Collomb D; Beck EJ; Van de Steen O; Dietz B
    J Med Econ; 2012; 15(4):796-806. PubMed ID: 22563716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost effectiveness of atazanavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the United States.
    Broder MS; Chang EY; Bentley TG; Juday T; Uy J
    J Med Econ; 2011; 14(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 21288058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir and atazanavir+ritonavir regimens in the CASTLE study.
    Simpson KN; Rajagopalan R; Dietz B
    Adv Ther; 2009 Feb; 26(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 19219410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in treatment-experienced, lopinavir-naive, protease inhibitor-resistant, HIV-infected adults in Belgium, Italy, Sweden and the UK.
    Moeremans K; Hemmett L; Hjelmgren J; Allegri G; Smets E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28 Suppl 1():147-67. PubMed ID: 21182349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of atazanavir/ritonavir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-1 patients in Sweden.
    Thuresson PO; Heeg B; Lescrauwaet B; Sennfält K; Alaeus A; Neubauer A
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2011 Apr; 43(4):304-12. PubMed ID: 21231811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Markov model and discrete-event simulation techniques for HIV.
    Simpson KN; Strassburger A; Jones WJ; Dietz B; Rajagopalan R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 19254048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis between darunavir/ritonavir and other protease inhibitors in treatment-naive human immunodeficiency syndrome type 1-infected patients in Spain].
    Smets E; Brogan AJ; Hill A; Adriaenssen I; Sawyer AW; Domingo-Pedrol P; Gostkorzewicz J; Ledesma F
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2013; 31(7):430-6. PubMed ID: 23260386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study.
    Molina JM; Andrade-Villanueva J; Echevarria J; Chetchotisakd P; Corral J; David N; Moyle G; Mancini M; Percival L; Yang R; Thiry A; McGrath D;
    Lancet; 2008 Aug; 372(9639):646-55. PubMed ID: 18722869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected adults with evidence of protease inhibitor resistance included in the TITAN Trial.
    Brogan A; Mauskopf J; Talbird SE; Smets E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28 Suppl 1():129-46. PubMed ID: 21182348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-utility analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir versus atazanavir + ritonavir administered as first-line therapy for the treatment of HIV infection in Italy: from randomised trial to real world.
    Foglia E; Bonfanti P; Rizzardini G; Bonizzoni E; Restelli U; Ricci E; Porazzi E; Scolari F; Croce D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57777. PubMed ID: 23460905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir combination antiretroviral therapy for treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection in Canada.
    Brogan AJ; Smets E; Mauskopf JA; Manuel SA; Adriaenssen I
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Sep; 32(9):903-17. PubMed ID: 24906477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atazanavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in HIV therapy.
    von Hentig N
    Drugs Today (Barc); 2008 Feb; 44(2):103-32. PubMed ID: 18389089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and safety of replacing lopinavir with atazanavir in HIV-infected patients with undetectable plasma viraemia: final results of the SLOAT trial.
    Soriano V; García-Gasco P; Vispo E; Ruiz-Sancho A; Blanco F; Martín-Carbonero L; Rodríguez-Novoa S; Morello J; de Mendoza C; Rivas P; Barreiro P; González-Lahoz J
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Jan; 61(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 17999977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Darunavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection in adults.
    McKeage K; Perry CM; Keam SJ
    Drugs; 2009; 69(4):477-503. PubMed ID: 19323590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-minimization comparison of darunavir plus ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 infected treatment-naïve women of childbearing age.
    Möller J; Desai K; Simpson K; Baran RW; Van de Steen O; Dietz B; Gooch K
    J Med Econ; 2014 Apr; 17(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 24351091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir versus nelfinavir as the first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen for HIV infection.
    Simpson KN; Luo MP; Chumney E; Sun E; Brun S; Ashraf T
    HIV Clin Trials; 2004; 5(5):294-304. PubMed ID: 15562370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir in highly treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected adults in the USA.
    Mauskopf J; Brogan A; Martin S; Smets E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28 Suppl 1():83-105. PubMed ID: 21182346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.