91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17178006)
1. Communicating population health statistics through graphs: a randomised controlled trial of graph design interventions.
Muscatello DJ; Searles A; MacDonald R; Jorm L
BMC Med; 2006 Dec; 4():33. PubMed ID: 17178006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Communicating projected survival with treatments for chronic kidney disease: patient comprehension and perspectives on visual aids.
Dowen F; Sidhu K; Broadbent E; Pilmore H
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Sep; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 28934951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bar and line graph comprehension: an interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes.
Shah P; Freedman EG
Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Jul; 3(3):560-78. PubMed ID: 25164403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy.
van Weert JCM; Alblas MC; van Dijk L; Jansen J
Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Jan; 104(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 32727670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of different visual presentations on the public's comprehension of prognostic information using acute and chronic condition scenarios: two online randomised controlled trials.
Abukmail E; Bakhit M; Jones M; Del Mar C; Hoffmann T
BMJ Open; 2023 Jun; 13(6):e067624. PubMed ID: 37316324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recruitment of the ventral and dorsal streams in statistical graph comprehension: An fMRI study.
Li M; Lu S; Zhong N
Technol Health Care; 2015; 23 Suppl 2():S593-601. PubMed ID: 26410528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Graph schema and best graph type to compare discrete groups: Bar, line, and pie.
Zhao F; Gaschler R
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():991420. PubMed ID: 36600703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of spatial compatibility on integration processes in graph comprehension.
Huestegge L; Philipp AM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1903-15. PubMed ID: 21678020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating graph comprehension in students with dyslexia: an eye tracking study.
Kim S; Lombardino LJ; Cowles W; Altmann LJ
Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1609-22. PubMed ID: 24770469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of Gestalt laws of perceptual organization on the comprehension of three-variable bar and line graphs.
Ali N; Peebles D
Hum Factors; 2013 Feb; 55(1):183-203. PubMed ID: 23516801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A componential model of human interaction with graphs: VI. Cognitive engineering of pie graphs.
Gillan DJ; Callahan AB
Hum Factors; 2000; 42(4):566-91. PubMed ID: 11324851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On Effective Graphic Communication of Health Inequality: Considerations for Health Policy Researchers.
Asada Y; Abel H; Skedgel C; Warner G
Milbank Q; 2017 Dec; 95(4):801-835. PubMed ID: 29226437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial legend compatibility within versus between graphs in multiple graph comprehension.
Riechelmann E; Huestegge L
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):1011-1022. PubMed ID: 29392621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tables or bar graphs? Presenting test results in electronic medical records.
Brewer NT; Gilkey MB; Lillie SE; Hesse BW; Sheridan SL
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):545-53. PubMed ID: 22472914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of decision aids on patient preferences for anticoagulant therapy: a randomized trial.
Holbrook A; Labiris R; Goldsmith CH; Ota K; Harb S; Sebaldt RJ
CMAJ; 2007 May; 176(11):1583-7. PubMed ID: 17515584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Communicating data about the benefits and harms of treatment: a randomized trial.
Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 21768582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Experimental investigation of the effects of representations and perspectives for the comprehension of line graphs].
Kanzaki N; Miwa K
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2012 Aug; 83(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 23012817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two graphs walk into a bar: Readout-based measurement reveals the Bar-Tip Limit error, a common, categorical misinterpretation of mean bar graphs.
Kerns SH; Wilmer JB
J Vis; 2021 Nov; 21(12):17. PubMed ID: 34846520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misleading graphs in context: Less misleading than expected.
Driessen JEP; Vos DAC; Smeets I; Albers CJ
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0265823. PubMed ID: 35704592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
