These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17178540)
1. The vision of the Disability Services Act 1986: a never-ending struggle. Ward M J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2006 Dec; 31(4):253-4. PubMed ID: 17178540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Disability Services Act 1986: twenty years on. Stancliffe RJ J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2006 Dec; 31(4):252. PubMed ID: 17178539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What stories will we tell? Habel M Rehabil Nurs; 1992; 17(6):6. PubMed ID: 1492166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Optometrists as "acceptable medical sources" to establish a medically determinable impairment. Final rules. Social Security Administration Fed Regist; 2007 Mar; 72(40):9239-42. PubMed ID: 17447332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stigma haunts persons with mental illness who seek relief as per Disability Act 1995. Math SB; Nirmala MC Indian J Med Res; 2011 Jul; 134(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 21808147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Redefining disability: maleficent, unjust and inconsistent. Cox-White B; Boxall SF J Med Philos; 2008 Dec; 33(6):558-76. PubMed ID: 19074236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disability Services Act. Rizzalli CE Med J Aust; 1991 Jul; 155(2):133. PubMed ID: 1830362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lacunae of disability certification in mental health. Swami MK Indian J Med Res; 2012; 135(2):258; author reply 258-9. PubMed ID: 22446873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Amendments to the quick disability determination process. Final rule. Social Security Administration Fed Regist; 2007 Sep; 72(172):51173-9. PubMed ID: 17886400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How not to end disability. Richards JR San Diego Law Rev; 2002; 39(3):693-713. PubMed ID: 15508229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. D is for drug addiction--and disability. Berger PB CMAJ; 2001 May; 164(11):1565-6. PubMed ID: 11402793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A fair deal for the handicapped. Kroeber MJ Aust Nurses J; 1978 Mar; 7(8):46-9. PubMed ID: 148882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The ADA Restoration Act of 2007: why is it necessary? Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2008; 32(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 18557400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Revised medical criteria for evaluating immune system disorders. Final rules. Social Security Administration Fed Regist; 2008 Mar; 73(53):14369-616. PubMed ID: 18464345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The 5th revision of the law on disability insurance - employment of disabled persons]. Boudry JF; Rilliot J; Studer JP; Villard G Rev Med Suisse; 2007 Aug; 3(122):1916-7. PubMed ID: 17896667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evidence or common experience: when does "substantial limitation" require substantial proof under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Anderson CL Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Dec; 57(2):409-78. PubMed ID: 18354868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Principles, patient welfare and the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000. Stevenson GS; Ryan T; Anderson S Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 19217161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A primer: Social Security Act programs to assist the disabled. Soc Secur Bull; 2005-2006; 66(3):53-9. PubMed ID: 17252743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Status of demands on rehabilitation among handicapped persons of six categories in Beijing]. Shi JL; Peng H; Wei ZY Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 29(7):647-51. PubMed ID: 19031752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Opportunity or frustration in social services: a law for dependence]. Moragas R Rev Enferm; 2007 Feb; 30(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 17416081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]