BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17178651)

  • 1. Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 17178651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
    Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capturing attention to brake lamps.
    McIntyre SE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):691-6. PubMed ID: 18329422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a sudden brake warning system: effect on the response time of the following driver.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 20034608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What happens when drivers of automated vehicles take over control in critical brake situations?
    Roche F; Thüring M; Trukenbrod AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105588. PubMed ID: 32531374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The experiences and perceptions of heavy vehicle drivers and train drivers of dangers at railway level crossings.
    Davey J; Wallace A; Stenson N; Freeman J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1217-22. PubMed ID: 18460391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Light truck vehicles (LTVs) contribution to rear-end collisions.
    Harb R; Radwan E; Yan X; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Sep; 39(5):1026-36. PubMed ID: 17359926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
    Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
    Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour--a driving simulator study.
    Markvollrath ; Schleicher S; Gelau C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21376911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioural accident avoidance science: understanding response in collision incipient conditions.
    Hancock PA; de Ridder SN
    Ergonomics; 2003 Oct; 46(12):1111-35. PubMed ID: 12933076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles.
    Gold C; Happee R; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():3-13. PubMed ID: 29196019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of vehicle model and driver behavior on risk.
    Wenzel TP; Ross M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 May; 37(3):479-94. PubMed ID: 15784202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectations while car following--the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task.
    Muhrer E; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):2158-64. PubMed ID: 20728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.
    Yan X; Abdel-Aty M; Radwan E; Wang X; Chilakapati P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):274-88. PubMed ID: 18215559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of in-vehicle tasks and time-gap selection while reclaiming control from adaptive cruise control (ACC) with bus simulator.
    Lin TW; Hwang SL; Su JM; Chen WH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1164-70. PubMed ID: 18460385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.