These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17178651)

  • 1. Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 17178651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
    Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capturing attention to brake lamps.
    McIntyre SE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):691-6. PubMed ID: 18329422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a sudden brake warning system: effect on the response time of the following driver.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 20034608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What happens when drivers of automated vehicles take over control in critical brake situations?
    Roche F; Thüring M; Trukenbrod AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105588. PubMed ID: 32531374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The experiences and perceptions of heavy vehicle drivers and train drivers of dangers at railway level crossings.
    Davey J; Wallace A; Stenson N; Freeman J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1217-22. PubMed ID: 18460391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Light truck vehicles (LTVs) contribution to rear-end collisions.
    Harb R; Radwan E; Yan X; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Sep; 39(5):1026-36. PubMed ID: 17359926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
    Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
    Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour--a driving simulator study.
    Markvollrath ; Schleicher S; Gelau C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21376911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioural accident avoidance science: understanding response in collision incipient conditions.
    Hancock PA; de Ridder SN
    Ergonomics; 2003 Oct; 46(12):1111-35. PubMed ID: 12933076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles.
    Gold C; Happee R; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():3-13. PubMed ID: 29196019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of vehicle model and driver behavior on risk.
    Wenzel TP; Ross M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 May; 37(3):479-94. PubMed ID: 15784202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectations while car following--the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task.
    Muhrer E; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):2158-64. PubMed ID: 20728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.
    Yan X; Abdel-Aty M; Radwan E; Wang X; Chilakapati P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):274-88. PubMed ID: 18215559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of in-vehicle tasks and time-gap selection while reclaiming control from adaptive cruise control (ACC) with bus simulator.
    Lin TW; Hwang SL; Su JM; Chen WH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1164-70. PubMed ID: 18460385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.