These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17178929)

  • 1. Systematic and heuristic processing of majority and minority-endorsed messages: the effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing.
    Martin R; Hewstone M; Martin PY
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17178929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: a matching perspective.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):114-25. PubMed ID: 19106081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minority versus majority influence and uncertainty orientation: processing persuasive messages on the basis of situational expectancies.
    Shuper PA; Sorrentino RM
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):127-47. PubMed ID: 15074502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Source entitativity and the elaboration of persuasive messages: the roles of perceived efficacy and message discrepancy.
    Clark JK; Wegener DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jul; 97(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 19586238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mood and multiple source characteristics: mood congruency of source consensus status and source trustworthiness as determinants of message scrutiny.
    Ziegler R; Diehl M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1016-30. PubMed ID: 21632961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resisting persuasion by illegitimate means: a metacognitive perspective on minority influence.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Mar; 33(3):354-67. PubMed ID: 17312317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Source consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus: the three dimensions of the Kelley ANOVA model in persuasion.
    Ziegler R; Diehl M; Zigon R; Fett T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Mar; 30(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 15030625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic.
    Barden J; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):489-509. PubMed ID: 18729690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncertainty orientation in the group context: categorization effects on persuasive message processing.
    Hodson G; Sorrentino RM
    J Soc Psychol; 2003 Jun; 143(3):291-312. PubMed ID: 12846514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition.
    Haddock G; Maio GR; Arnold K; Huskinson T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 18344496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-guide framing and persuasion: responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels.
    Evans LM; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 15273009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach.
    Van Kleef GA; De Dreu CK; Manstead AS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Oct; 87(4):510-28. PubMed ID: 15491275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and time pressure in persuasion.
    Kao DT
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 21752025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of suspicion on willingness to engage in systematic processing of persuasive arguments.
    Echebarria-Echabe A
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):148-59. PubMed ID: 20397591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Future goal setting, task motivation and learning of minority and non-minority students in Dutch schools.
    Andriessen I; Phalet K; Lens W
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2006 Dec; 76(Pt 4):827-50. PubMed ID: 17094888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thinking straight while seeing red: the influence of anger on information processing.
    Moons WG; Mackie DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 May; 33(5):706-20. PubMed ID: 17440205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relevance override: on the reduced impact of "cues" under high-motivation conditions of persuasion studies.
    Pierro A; Mannetti L; Kruglanski AW; Sleeth-Keppler D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 14769082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence.
    Imhoff R; Erb HP
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 35(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 19098256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of embodied emotive states on cognitive categorization.
    Price TF; Harmon-Jones E
    Emotion; 2010 Dec; 10(6):934-8. PubMed ID: 21171763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.