These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17179354)

  • 1. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
    Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
    Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
    Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
    Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists.
    Neri E; Faggioni L; Regge D; Vagli P; Turini F; Cerri F; Picano E; Giusti S; Bartolozzi C
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 20832219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital bowel cleansing free colonic polyp detection method for fecal tagging CT colonography.
    Oda M; Kitasaka T; Mori K; Suenaga Y; Takayama T; Takabatake H; Mori M; Natori H; Nawano S
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 19268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of different window settings on colon polyp measurements with CT virtual colonoscopy: a phantom study.
    Wu XW; Wang WQ; Xu JM; Liu B
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 21724119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.
    Jeong JY; Kim MJ; Kim SS
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18206622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.
    Bethea E; Nwawka OK; Dachman AH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19933648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings.
    Bräuer C; Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Ringl H; Al-Mukhtar A; Apfaltrer P; Berzaczy D; Füger B; Furtner J; Müller-Mang C; Pones M; Scharitzer M; Woitek R; Graser A; Weber M; Mang T
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4766-4774. PubMed ID: 29761359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mixture of expert 3D massive-training ANNs for reduction of multiple types of false positives in CAD for detection of polyps in CT colonography.
    Suzuki K; Yoshida H; Näppi J; Armato SG; Dachman AH
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):694-703. PubMed ID: 18383691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CT colonography: automatic measurement of polyp diameter compared with manual assessment - an in-vivo study.
    Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Feb; 62(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 17207697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; Taylor AJ; Michel SJ; Winter TC; Shadid A; Meiners RJ; Chase PJ; Hinshaw JL; Williams JG; Prout TM; Husain SH; Kim DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1451-6. PubMed ID: 18029884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protrusion method for automated estimation of polyp size on CT colonography.
    van Wijk C; Florie J; Nio CY; Dekker E; de Vries AH; Venema HW; van Vliet LJ; Stoker J; Vos FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1279-85. PubMed ID: 18430844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
    Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
    Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Colorectal polyps on portal phase contrast-enhanced CT colonography: lesion attenuation and distinction from tagged feces.
    Lee SS; Park SH; Choi EK; Kim SY; Kim MJ; Lee KH; Kim YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17579149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT colonography: effect of colonic distension on polyp measurement accuracy and agreement-in vitro study.
    Taylor S; Slater A; Honeyfield L; Burling D; Halligan S
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):850-9. PubMed ID: 16777559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.