These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17179373)

  • 1. Trends in time to completion of mammographic screening and follow-up services.
    Yabroff KR; Ashbeck E; Rosenberg R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):242-5. PubMed ID: 17179373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures.
    Brown ML; Houn F; Sickles EA; Kessler LG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1373-7. PubMed ID: 7484568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
    Rosenberg RD; Hunt WC; Williamson MR; Gilliland FD; Wiest PW; Kelsey CA; Key CR; Linver MN
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):511-8. PubMed ID: 9807581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time trends in breast cancer screening rates in the OECD countries.
    Saika K; Sobue T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 41(4):591-2. PubMed ID: 21447696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Number needed to screen: lives saved over 20 years of follow-up in mammographic screening.
    Tabar L; Vitak B; Yen MF; Chen HH; Smith RA; Duffy SW
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 15333270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Mammographic examinations in Denmark, 1990-1991].
    Andreasen AH; Andersen KW; Madsen M; Mouridsen HT; Olesen KP; Lynge E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Oct; 156(44):6517-20. PubMed ID: 7825250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer screening: recent trends in the use of mammography in Nebraska.
    Rettig B; Nelson N; Faulk R
    Nebr Med J; 1994 May; 79(5):136-8; discussion 139. PubMed ID: 8047188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Schematization and forcing of the analysis of mammographic screening effectiveness].
    Liberati A
    Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 26(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 12125384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield.
    Helvie MA; Pennes DR; Rebner M; Adler DD
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):155-8. PubMed ID: 1984295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic screening from age 40 years.
    Kulaga SN; Karp I
    Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9563):738-739. PubMed ID: 17336641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic screening from age 40 years.
    Bonneux L
    Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9563):737. PubMed ID: 17336638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic screening from age 40 years.
    Gøtzsche PC
    Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9563):737-738. PubMed ID: 17336640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [To the Editors: Comment on the study by Kullmann and Misset "Benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening"].
    Laszlo T
    Orv Hetil; 2010 Dec; 151(49):2032-3, discussion 2033-4.. PubMed ID: 21361059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient protection and affordable care act elimination of mammogram copays has increased mammography rates.
    Printz C
    Cancer; 2018 May; 124(10):2070. PubMed ID: 29727491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):471-5. PubMed ID: 9680578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Ernster VL; Barclay J; Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Henderson C
    JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(12):913-8. PubMed ID: 8598618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in mammography utilization, 1981 to 1994.
    Gaudette LA; Altmayer CA; Nobrega KM; Lee J
    Health Rep; 1996; 8(3):17-27(Eng); 19-30(Fre). PubMed ID: 9085118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening.
    Kavanagh AM; Mitchell H; Giles GG
    Lancet; 2000 Jan; 355(9200):270-4. PubMed ID: 10675074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.