These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17180320)

  • 1. Mechanisms of recognition of the outlines of "vanishing" optotypes.
    Koskin SA; Boiko EV; Sobolev AF; Shelepin YE
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2007 Jan; 37(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17180320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Visual mechanisms of recognition of vanishing figures].
    Koskin SA; Boĭko EV; Sobolev AF; Shelepin IuE
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2005 Sep; 91(9):1080-90. PubMed ID: 16353483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The optical-geometrical characteristics and thresholds of perception of fragmented outline figures.
    Merkul'ev AV; Shelepin YE; Chikhman VN; Pronin SV; Foreman N
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2005 Jan; 35(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 15739791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
    Heinrich SP; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The visual resolution of Landolt-C optotypes in human subjects depends on their orientation: the 'gap-down' effect.
    Schrauf M; Stern C
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Feb; 299(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 11165766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Color stimuli perception in presence of light scattering.
    Ozolinsh M; Colomb M; Ikaunieks G; Karitans V
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):597-601. PubMed ID: 16962002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.
    González EG; Tarita-Nistor L; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4838-45. PubMed ID: 17898311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity.
    Hamm LM; Yeoman JP; Anstice N; Dakin SC
    J Vis; 2018 Mar; 18(3):13. PubMed ID: 29677328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling acuity for optotypes varying in complexity.
    Watson AB; Ahumada AJ
    J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Far visual acuity is unremarkable in autism: do we need to focus on crowding?
    Kéïta L; Mottron L; Bertone A
    Autism Res; 2010 Dec; 3(6):333-41. PubMed ID: 20928845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vanishing optotypes. New type of acuity test letters.
    Frisén L
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Aug; 104(8):1194-8. PubMed ID: 3741251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic visual acuity using "far" and "near" targets.
    Peters BT; Bloomberg JJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 15823804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Optical-geometrical parameters and perception threshold of the fragmented contour figures].
    Merkul'ev AV; Shelepin IuE; Chikhman VN; Pronin SV; Foreman N
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2003 Jun; 89(6):731-7. PubMed ID: 12966711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of contrast sensitivity for the tumbling E and Landolt C.
    Alexander KR; McAnany JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 87(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 19996815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of exposure duration on visual acuity for letter optotypes and gratings.
    McAnany JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():86-91. PubMed ID: 25281413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The threshold signal:noise ratio in the perception of fragmented figures.
    Merkul'ev AV; Pronin SV; Semenov LA; Foreman N; Chikhman VN; Shelepin YE
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2006 Jan; 36(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 16328165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention and scintillation.
    VanRullen R; Dong T
    Vision Res; 2003 Sep; 43(21):2191-6. PubMed ID: 12885373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer monitor pixellation and Sloan letter visual acuity measurement.
    Carkeet A; Lister LJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 29280165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.