256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17180568)
1. Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes--a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature.
Weyhe D; Belyaev O; Müller C; Meurer K; Bauer KH; Papapostolou G; Uhl W
World J Surg; 2007 Jan; 31(1):234-44. PubMed ID: 17180568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Partially or completely absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair for inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Alam F; Tang TY; Walsh SR; Sadat U
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2010 Aug; 20(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 20729687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of TGF-beta1 as a determinant of foreign body reaction to alloplastic materials in rat fibroblast cultures: comparison of different commercially available polypropylene meshes for hernia repair.
Weyhe D; Hoffmann P; Belyaev O; Mros K; Muller C; Uhl W; Schmitz F
Regul Pept; 2007 Jan; 138(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 16973225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.
Scheidbach H; Tamme C; Tannapfel A; Lippert H; Köckerling F
Surg Endosc; 2004 Feb; 18(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 14691711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.
Weyhe D; Schmitz I; Belyaev O; Grabs R; Müller KM; Uhl W; Zumtobel V
World J Surg; 2006 Aug; 30(8):1586-91. PubMed ID: 16855805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Development of better tolerated prosthetic materials: applications in gynecological surgery].
Debodinance P; Delporte P; Engrand JB; Boulogne M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):527-40. PubMed ID: 12407323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A meta-analysis comparing lightweight meshes with heavyweight meshes in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.
Zhong C; Wu B; Yang Z; Deng X; Kang J; Guo B; Fan Y
Surg Innov; 2013 Feb; 20(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23075529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-Year Results of a Single-Centre Single-Blinded Randomised Study Evaluating the Impact of Mesh Pore Size on Chronic Pain after Lichtenstein Hernioplasty.
Nikkolo C; Vaasna T; Murruste M; Seepter H; Kirsimägi Ü; Lepner U
Scand J Surg; 2016 Sep; 105(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 26929280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes.
Horstmann R; Hellwig M; Classen C; Röttgermann S; Palmes D
World J Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1742-9. PubMed ID: 16902744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair.
Nienhuijs SW; van Oort I; Keemers-Gels ME; Strobbe LJ; Rosman C
Br J Surg; 2005 Jan; 92(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 15593293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo evaluation of a new composite mesh (10% polypropylene/90% poly-L-lactic acid) for hernia repair.
Tanaka K; Mutter D; Inoue H; Lindner V; Bouras G; Forgione A; Leroy J; Aprahamian M; Marescaux J
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Jun; 18(6):991-9. PubMed ID: 17243000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Titanised polypropylene meshes: first clinical experience with the implantation in TAPP technique and the results of a survey in 22 German surgical departments].
Schardey HM; Schopf S; Rudert W; Knappich P; Hernandez-Richter T
Zentralbl Chir; 2004 Oct; 129(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 15486786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia.
Schmidbauer S; Ladurner R; Hallfeldt KK; Mussack T
Eur J Med Res; 2005 Jun; 10(6):247-53. PubMed ID: 16033714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Treatment of large postoperative hernias using intraperitoneal meshes].
Trojanowski P; Witczak W; Najdecki M; Stanowski E
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 May; 22(131):376-8. PubMed ID: 17679372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Large pore size and controlled mesh elongation are relevant predictors for mesh integration quality and low shrinkage--Systematic analysis of key parameters of meshes in a novel minipig hernia model.
Weyhe D; Cobb W; Lecuivre J; Alves A; Ladet S; Lomanto D; Bayon Y
Int J Surg; 2015 Oct; 22():46-53. PubMed ID: 26277532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biologic response of inguinal hernia prosthetics: a comparative study of conventional static meshes versus 3D dynamic implants.
Amato G; Romano G; Agrusa A; Marasa S; Cocorullo G; Gulotta G; Goetze T; Puleio R
Artif Organs; 2015 Jan; 39(1):E10-23. PubMed ID: 25626584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Self-adhesive mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Experience of a single center.
Tarchi P; Cosola D; Germani P; Troian M; De Manzini N
Minerva Chir; 2014 Jun; 69(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 24736447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair.
Nikkolo C; Lepner U
Postgrad Med; 2016 Jan; 128(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26567717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene mesh.
Koch A; Bringman S; Myrelid P; Smeds S; Kald A
Br J Surg; 2008 Oct; 95(10):1226-31. PubMed ID: 18763243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new prosthetic implant for inguinal hernia repair: its features in a porcine experimental model.
Amato G; Lo Monte AI; Cassata G; Damiano G; Romano G; Bussani R
Artif Organs; 2011 Aug; 35(8):E181-90. PubMed ID: 21752035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
