86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1718113)
1. Cytology of lumpectomy specimens.
Ku NN; Cox CE; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HM; Nicosia SV
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 1718113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation.
Cox CE; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HM; Nicosia SV; Wangensteen S
Arch Surg; 1991 Apr; 126(4):490-3. PubMed ID: 2009065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins.
Cendán JC; Coco D; Copeland EM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Aug; 201(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 16038815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation.
Weinberg E; Cox C; Dupont E; White L; Ebert M; Greenberg H; Diaz N; Vercel V; Centeno B; Cantor A; Nicosia S
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15474425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scrape cytology assessment of margins of lumpectomy specimens in breast cancer.
Gal R
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):838-9. PubMed ID: 3059734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors that influence the incidence of microscopic carcinoma in frozen and preserved specimens from patients with breast carcinoma after breast-conserving surgery.
Kim R; Osaki A; Kaneko M; Inai K; Toge T
Oncol Rep; 2003; 10(5):1321-8. PubMed ID: 12883701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures.
D'Halluin F; Tas P; Rouquette S; Bendavid C; Foucher F; Meshba H; Blanchot J; Coué O; Levêque J
Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 19515566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.
Camp ER; McAuliffe PF; Gilroy JS; Morris CG; Lind DS; Mendenhall NP; Copeland EM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16310688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of cytologic diagnoses made from touch imprints of image-guided needle biopsy specimens of nonpalpable breast abnormalities.
Sneige N; Tulbah A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 10907929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions.
Sauter ER; Hoffman JP; Ottery FD; Kowalyshyn MJ; Litwin S; Eisenberg BL
Cancer; 1994 May; 73(10):2607-12. PubMed ID: 8174059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of touch imprint cytology and Mohs frozen-section histology in the evaluation of Mohs micrographic surgical margins.
Florell SR; Layfield LJ; Gerwels JW
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Apr; 44(4):660-4. PubMed ID: 11260543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer.
Forbes RC; Pitchford C; Simpson JF; Balch GC; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Nov; 71(11):955-60; discussion 961-2. PubMed ID: 16372615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
