336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17181793)
1. Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Haig SM; Beever EA; Chambers SM; Draheim HM; Dugger BD; Dunham S; Elliott-Smith E; Fontaine JB; Kesler DC; Knaus BJ; Lopes IF; Loschl P; Mullins TD; Sheffield LM
Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1584-94. PubMed ID: 17181793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehensive genetic analyses reveal evolutionary distinction of a mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) proposed for delisting from the US Endangered Species Act.
King TL; Switzer JF; Morrison CL; Eackles MS; Young CC; Lubinski BA; Cryan P
Mol Ecol; 2006 Dec; 15(14):4331-59. PubMed ID: 17107469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A biological framework for evaluating whether a species is threatened or endangered in a significant portion of its range.
Waples RS; Adams PB; Bohnsack J; Taylor BL
Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):964-74. PubMed ID: 17650247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic data and the listing of species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Fallon SM
Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1186-95. PubMed ID: 17883484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
Himes Boor GK
Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The normative dimension and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Phillips MK
Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1383-90. PubMed ID: 17002756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species.
Mace GM; Collar NJ; Gaston KJ; Hilton-Taylor C; Akçakaya HR; Leader-Williams N; Milner-Gulland EJ; Stuart SN
Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1424-42. PubMed ID: 18847444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors Associated with Listing Decisions under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Smith-Hicks KN; Morrison ML
Environ Manage; 2021 Apr; 67(4):563-573. PubMed ID: 33638664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing allocation of management resources for wildlife.
Marsh H; Dennis A; Hines H; Kutt A; McDonald K; Weber E; Williams S; Winter J
Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):387-99. PubMed ID: 17391189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Climate change, marine environments, and the US Endangered species act.
Seney EE; Rowland MJ; Lowery RA; Griffis RB; McClure MM
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1138-46. PubMed ID: 24299080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impacts of phylogenetic nomenclature on the efficacy of the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Leslie MS
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 25155291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Threatened and endangered species: at what cost? The corps of engineers looks at expenditures and priorities.
Henderson JE; Smith JM
Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 39(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17106795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Plants on the IUCN Red List: setting priorities to inform conservation.
Schatz GE
Trends Plant Sci; 2009 Nov; 14(11):638-42. PubMed ID: 19773196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Considering legal viability and societal values when deciding what to conserve under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
D'Elia J; Zwartjes M; McCarthy S
Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):1072-4; discussion 1075-7. PubMed ID: 18637909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. National red listing beyond the 2010 target.
Zamin TJ; Baillie JE; Miller RM; Rodríguez JP; Ardid A; Collen B
Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1012-20. PubMed ID: 20337689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the effectiveness of reserve acquisition programs in protecting rare and threatened species.
Turner WR; Wilcove DS; Swain HM
Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1657-69. PubMed ID: 17181801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing decision rules for categorizing species' extinction risk to help develop quantitative listing criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Regan TJ; Taylor BL; Thompson GG; Cochrane JF; Ralls K; Runge MC; Merrick R
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):821-31. PubMed ID: 23646933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the US Clean Water Act 303(d) listing process for determining impairment of a waterbody.
Keller AA; Cavallaro L
J Environ Manage; 2008 Mar; 86(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 17270339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endangered species. New regulation would lessen influence of fish and wildlife experts.
Stokstad E
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5892):1030. PubMed ID: 18719258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
