547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17181801)
1. Assessing the effectiveness of reserve acquisition programs in protecting rare and threatened species.
Turner WR; Wilcove DS; Swain HM
Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1657-69. PubMed ID: 17181801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Plants on the IUCN Red List: setting priorities to inform conservation.
Schatz GE
Trends Plant Sci; 2009 Nov; 14(11):638-42. PubMed ID: 19773196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.
Dudgeon D; Arthington AH; Gessner MO; Kawabata Z; Knowler DJ; Lévêque C; Naiman RJ; Prieur-Richard AH; Soto D; Stiassny ML; Sullivan CA
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 May; 81(2):163-82. PubMed ID: 16336747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The capacity of Australia's protected-area system to represent threatened species.
Watson JE; Evans MC; Carwardine J; Fuller RA; Joseph LN; Segan DB; Taylor MF; Fensham RJ; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 20961332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of a threatened-species focus on conservation planning.
Drummond SP; Wilson KA; Meijaard E; Watts M; Dennis R; Christy L; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 19843123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates.
Grenyer R; Orme CD; Jackson SF; Thomas GH; Davies RG; Davies TJ; Jones KE; Olson VA; Ridgely RS; Rasmussen PC; Ding TS; Bennett PM; Blackburn TM; Gaston KJ; Gittleman JL; Owens IP
Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7115):93-6. PubMed ID: 17080090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Past and present effectiveness of protected areas for conservation of naturally and anthropogenically rare plant species.
Vellak A; Tuvi EL; Reier Ü; Kalamees R; Roosaluste E; Zobel M; Pärtel M
Conserv Biol; 2009 Jun; 23(3):750-7. PubMed ID: 19128324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protecting rare, little known, old-growth forest-associated fungi in the Pacific Northwest USA: a case study in fungal conservation.
Molina R
Mycol Res; 2008 Jun; 112(Pt 6):613-38. PubMed ID: 18486464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A riparian wildlife habitat evaluation scheme developed using GIS.
Iverson LR; Szafoni DL; Baum SE; Cook EA
Environ Manage; 2001 Nov; 28(5):639-54. PubMed ID: 11568844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biological framework for evaluating whether a species is threatened or endangered in a significant portion of its range.
Waples RS; Adams PB; Bohnsack J; Taylor BL
Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):964-74. PubMed ID: 17650247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis.
Faith DP
Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1461-70. PubMed ID: 18798854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative determination of rarity of freshwater fishes and implications for imperiled-species designations.
Pritt JJ; Frimpong EA
Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1249-58. PubMed ID: 20337684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rates of movement of threatened bird species between IUCN red list categories and toward extinction.
Brooke Mde L; Butchart SH; Garnett ST; Crowley GM; Mantilla-Beniers NB; Stattersfield AJ
Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):417-27. PubMed ID: 18402584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Range size and extinction risk in forest birds.
Harris G; Pimm SL
Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 18254861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species.
Mace GM; Collar NJ; Gaston KJ; Hilton-Taylor C; Akçakaya HR; Leader-Williams N; Milner-Gulland EJ; Stuart SN
Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1424-42. PubMed ID: 18847444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Terrestrial reserve networks do not adequately represent aquatic ecosystems.
Herbert ME; McIntyre PB; Doran PJ; Allan JD; Abell R
Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1002-11. PubMed ID: 20337671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Demographic consequences of terrestrial habitat loss for pool-breeding amphibians: predicting extinction risks associated with inadequate size of buffer zones.
Harper EB; Rittenhouse TA; Semlitsch RD
Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1205-15. PubMed ID: 18717698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Botanic gardens science for conservation and global change.
Donaldson JS
Trends Plant Sci; 2009 Nov; 14(11):608-13. PubMed ID: 19773195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation.
Milder JC; Lassoie JP; Bedford BL
Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 18254854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inferring national and regional declines of rare orchid species with probabilistic models.
Duffy KJ; Kingston NE; Sayers BA; Roberts DL; Stout JC
Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 18798858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
