BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

510 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17181844)

  • 1. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome.
    Iversen LH; Harling H; Laurberg S; Wille-Jørgensen P;
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jan; 9(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 17181844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short-term outcome.
    Iversen LH; Harling H; Laurberg S; Wille-Jørgensen P
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jan; 9(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 17181843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of the surgeon's and the hospital's caseload on survival and local recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery.
    Renzulli P; Lowy A; Maibach R; Egeli RA; Metzger U; Laffer UT
    Surgery; 2006 Mar; 139(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 16546492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.
    Iversen LH
    Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.
    Archampong D; Borowski D; Wille-Jørgensen P; Iversen LH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD005391. PubMed ID: 22419309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modifiable risk factors in colorectal surgery: central role of surgeon's volume.
    Pata G; Casella C; Nascimbeni R; Cirillo L; Salerni B
    Ann Ital Chir; 2008; 79(6):427-32; discussion 432-3. PubMed ID: 19354037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of hospital caseload on long-term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery at a national level.
    Wibe A; Eriksen MT; Syse A; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
    Br J Surg; 2005 Feb; 92(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 15584060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery.
    van Gijn W; Gooiker GA; Wouters MW; Post PN; Tollenaar RA; van de Velde CJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S55-63. PubMed ID: 20615649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of rectal cancer surgery and its relationship to surgeon and hospital caseload: a population-based study.
    Comber H; Sharp L; Timmons A; Keane FB
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):e692-700. PubMed ID: 22731759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radical cystectomy: defining the threshold for a surgeon to achieve optimum outcomes.
    McCabe JE; Jibawi A; Javle PM
    Postgrad Med J; 2007 Aug; 83(982):556-60. PubMed ID: 17675551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning curve: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer surgery.
    Renzulli P; Laffer UT
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 2005; 165():86-104. PubMed ID: 15865024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery.
    Borowski DW; Kelly SB; Bradburn DM; Wilson RG; Gunn A; Ratcliffe AA;
    Br J Surg; 2007 Jul; 94(7):880-9. PubMed ID: 17410637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer].
    Kuhry E; Saetnan E; Graeslie H; Gaupset R
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Nov; 127(22):2946-9. PubMed ID: 18026242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgeon and hospital-related risk factors in colorectal cancer surgery.
    Brännström F; Jestin P; Matthiessen P; Gunnarsson U
    Colorectal Dis; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1370-6. PubMed ID: 20969714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome of acutely perforated colorectal cancers: experience of a single district general hospital.
    Anwar MA; D'Souza F; Coulter R; Memon B; Khan IM; Memon MA
    Surg Oncol; 2006 Aug; 15(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 17049848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The surgeon's decision as a prognostic factor in a pool of patients with colorectal cancer coming from different institutions.
    Franchi F; Rossi L; Izzo L; Binda B; Pastore C; Falconi C; Amoroso A; Cammarata A; Cicconetti F; Seminara P
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2003 Sep; 22(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 14582695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer.
    Marusch F; Koch A; Schmidt U; Pross M; Gastinger I; Lippert H
    Br J Surg; 2001 Oct; 88(10):1397-402. PubMed ID: 11578299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of postoperative complications on long-term outcomes following curative resection for colorectal cancer.
    Law WL; Choi HK; Lee YM; Ho JW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):2559-66. PubMed ID: 17522945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence of the effect of 'specialization' on the management, surgical outcome and survival from colorectal cancer in Wessex.
    Smith JA; King PM; Lane RH; Thompson MR
    Br J Surg; 2003 May; 90(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 12734867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgeon's awareness of the synchronous liver metastases during colorectal cancer resection may affect outcome.
    Hamady ZZ; Malik HZ; Alwan N; Wyatt JI; Prasad KR; Toogood GJ; Lodge JP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 17983724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.