BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17182078)

  • 1. Mutagenicity evaluation of industrial sludge from common effluent treatment plant.
    Mathur N; Bhatnagar P; Mohan K; Bakre P; Nagar P; Bijarnia M
    Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(6):1229-35. PubMed ID: 17182078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genotoxic and mutagenic potential of agricultural soil irrigated with tannery effluents at Jajmau (Kanpur), India.
    Alam MZ; Ahmad S; Malik A
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009 Oct; 57(3):463-76. PubMed ID: 19153791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handmade paper and cardboard industries: in health perspectives.
    Kulshreshtha S; Mathur N; Bhatnagar P
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2011 Jul; 27(6):515-21. PubMed ID: 21343227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction in the mutagenicity of synthetic dyes by successive treatment with activated sludge and the ligninolytic fungus, Irpex lacteus.
    Malachová K; Pavlícková Z; Novotný C; Svobodová K; Lednická D; Musílková E
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2006 Aug; 47(7):533-40. PubMed ID: 16758470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination of in vitro bioassays for the determination of cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of wastewater, surface water and drinking water samples.
    Zegura B; Heath E; Cernosa A; Filipic M
    Chemosphere; 2009 Jun; 75(11):1453-60. PubMed ID: 19307011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of the genotoxic effects of industrial and domestic waste].
    Kan SV; Abdrazakov MM; Soldatov SP
    Nauchnye Doki Vyss Shkoly Biol Nauki; 1987; (5):81-5. PubMed ID: 3300790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Industrial effluents and surface waters genotoxicity and mutagenicity evaluation of a river of Tucuman, Argentina.
    Gana JM; Ordóñez R; Zampini C; Hidalgo M; Meoni S; Isla MI
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jul; 155(3):403-6. PubMed ID: 18178309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mutagenicity assessment of effluents from textile/dye industries of Sanganer, Jaipur (India): a case study.
    Mathur N; Bhatnagar P; Nagar P; Bijarnia MK
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 May; 61(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 15814316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mutagenicity of leachates from industrial solid wastes using Salmonella reverse mutation assay.
    Singh A; Chandra S; Kumar Gupta S; Chauhan LK; Kumar Rath S
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Feb; 66(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 16620981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The contribution of azo dyes to the mutagenic activity of the Cristais River.
    de Aragão Umbuzeiro G; Freeman HS; Warren SH; de Oliveira DP; Terao Y; Watanabe T; Claxton LD
    Chemosphere; 2005 Jun; 60(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15910902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mutagenicity and genotoxicity of suspended particulate matter in the Seine river estuary.
    Vincent-Hubert F; Heas-Moisan K; Munschy C; Tronczynski J
    Mutat Res; 2012 Jan; 741(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 22079610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genotoxicity of wastewaters used for irrigation of food crops.
    Ansari MI; Malik A
    Environ Toxicol; 2009 Apr; 24(2):103-15. PubMed ID: 18442071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in toxicity and genotoxicity of industrial sewage sludge samples containing nitro- and amino-aromatic compounds following treatment in bioreactors with different oxygen regimes.
    Klee N; Gustavsson L; Kosmehl T; Engwall M; Erdinger L; Braunbeck T; Hollert H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2004; 11(5):313-20. PubMed ID: 15506634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of a textile azo dye processing plant effluent that impacts a drinking water source.
    Alves de Lima RO; Bazo AP; Salvadori DM; Rech CM; de Palma Oliveira D; de Aragão Umbuzeiro G
    Mutat Res; 2007 Jan; 626(1-2):53-60. PubMed ID: 17027325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mutagens in surface waters: a review.
    Ohe T; Watanabe T; Wakabayashi K
    Mutat Res; 2004 Nov; 567(2-3):109-49. PubMed ID: 15572284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of two wastewater treatment plants in removing genotoxins.
    Jolibois B; Guerbet M
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Apr; 48(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 15750782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotoxicity evaluation of hospital wastewaters.
    Gupta P; Mathur N; Bhatnagar P; Nagar P; Srivastava S
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Oct; 72(7):1925-32. PubMed ID: 19524298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genotoxicity of wastewater samples from sewage and industrial effluent detected by the Allium root anaphase aberration and micronucleus assays.
    Grover IS; Kaur S
    Mutat Res; 1999 May; 426(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 10350595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of Salmonella/microsome reversion bioassay for monitoring industrial wastewater treatment plants in Rajasthan, India.
    Mathur N; Bhatnagar P; Bakre P
    J Environ Biol; 2012 May; 33(3):531-7. PubMed ID: 23029899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ecotoxicological evaluation of the wastewater treatment process of the sewage treatment plant of Thessaloniki, Greece.
    Katsoyiannis A; Samara C
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 16973262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.