127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17182097)
1. Group analysis of regulation of fibroblast genome on low-adhesion nanostructures.
Dalby MJ; Gadegaard N; Herzyk P; Agheli H; Sutherland DS; Wilkinson CD
Biomaterials; 2007 Apr; 28(10):1761-9. PubMed ID: 17182097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion.
Loesberg WA; te Riet J; van Delft FC; Schön P; Figdor CG; Speller S; van Loon JJ; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
Biomaterials; 2007 Sep; 28(27):3944-51. PubMed ID: 17576010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fibroblast signaling events in response to nanotopography: a gene array study.
Dalby MJ; Yarwood SJ; Johnstone HJ; Affrossman S; Riehle MO
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2002 Mar; 1(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 16689216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading.
Biggs MJ; Richards RG; Gadegaard N; Wilkinson CD; Dalby MJ
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Feb; 18(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 17323174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human fibroblast and human bone marrow cell response to lithographically nanopatterned adhesive domains on protein rejecting substrates.
Berry CC; Curtis AS; Oreffo RO; Agheli H; Sutherland DS
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2007 Sep; 6(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 17926777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. TiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm--an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation.
Park J; Bauer S; Schlegel KA; Neukam FW; von der Mark K; Schmuki P
Small; 2009 Mar; 5(6):666-71. PubMed ID: 19235196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography.
Dalby MJ; Riehle MO; Sutherland DS; Agheli H; Curtis AS
Biomaterials; 2004 Oct; 25(23):5415-22. PubMed ID: 15130726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of colloidal nanotopography on initial fibroblast adhesion and morphology.
Wood MA; Wilkinson CD; Curtis AS
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2006 Mar; 5(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 16570870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modulation of human mesenchymal stem cell behavior on ordered tantalum nanotopographies fabricated using colloidal lithography and glancing angle deposition.
Wang PY; Bennetsen DT; Foss M; Ameringer T; Thissen H; Kingshott P
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Mar; 7(8):4979-89. PubMed ID: 25664369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A hierarchical response of cells to perpendicular micro- and nanometric textural cues.
Seunarine K; Curtis AS; Meredith DO; Wilkinson CD; Riehle MO; Gadegaard N
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2009 Sep; 8(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19278933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range.
Biela SA; Su Y; Spatz JP; Kemkemer R
Acta Biomater; 2009 Sep; 5(7):2460-6. PubMed ID: 19410529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography.
Choi CH; Hagvall SH; Wu BM; Dunn JC; Beygui RE; CJ Kim CJ
Biomaterials; 2007 Mar; 28(9):1672-9. PubMed ID: 17174392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Global Gene Expression Analysis for the Assessment of Nanobiomaterials.
Hanagata N
Front Oral Biol; 2015; 17():78-89. PubMed ID: 26201278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography.
Lim JY; Dreiss AD; Zhou Z; Hansen JC; Siedlecki CA; Hengstebeck RW; Cheng J; Winograd N; Donahue HJ
Biomaterials; 2007 Apr; 28(10):1787-97. PubMed ID: 17218005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fibroblast response is enhanced by poly(L-lactic acid) nanotopography edge density and proximity.
Milner KR; Siedlecki CA
Int J Nanomedicine; 2007; 2(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 17722548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complex microstructured 3D surfaces using chitosan biopolymer.
Fernandez JG; Mills CA; Samitier J
Small; 2009 Mar; 5(5):614-20. PubMed ID: 19263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interaction of animal cells with ordered nanotopography.
Gallagher JO; McGhee KF; Wilkinson CD; Riehle MO
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2002 Mar; 1(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16689218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic characterization of perturbation sensitivity.
Ohn JH; Kim J; Kim JH
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i354-8. PubMed ID: 17646317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adhesion and proliferation of fibroblasts on cluster-assembled nanostructured carbon films: the role of surface morphology.
Lenardi C; Perego C; Cassina V; Podestà A; D'Amico A; Gualandris D; Vinati S; Fiorentini F; Bongiorno G; Piserj P; Vellea Sacchi F; Milani P
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2006 Dec; 6(12):3718-30. PubMed ID: 17256321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The spatial and temporal control of cell migration by nanoporous surfaces through the regulation of ERK and integrins in fibroblasts.
Pan HA; Liang JY; Hung YC; Lee CH; Chiou JC; Huang GS
Biomaterials; 2013 Jan; 34(4):841-53. PubMed ID: 23131534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
