These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17182876)

  • 1. Speech Recognition in noise in children with cochlear implants while listening in bilateral, bimodal, and FM-system arrangements.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 17182876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Mok M; Galvin KL; Dowell RC; McKay CM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 19468210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Influence of mixing ratios of a FM-system on speech understanding of CI-users].
    Hey M; Anft D; Hocke T; Scholz G; Hessel H; Begall K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2009 May; 88(5):315-21. PubMed ID: 19105120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance in children with hearing aids or cochlear implants: bilateral stimulation and binaural hearing.
    Ching TY; van Wanrooy E; Hill M; Incerti P
    Int J Audiol; 2006; 45 Suppl 1():S108-12. PubMed ID: 16938782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
    Jeong SW; Kang MY; Kim LS
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear.
    Hamzavi J; Pok SM; Gstoettner W; Baumgartner WD
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Feb; 43(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 15035557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech detection in noise and spatial unmasking in children with simultaneous versus sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Chadha NK; Papsin BC; Jiwani S; Gordon KA
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1057-64. PubMed ID: 21725259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.