138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17183134)
1. Influence of the linac design on intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck plans.
Topolnjak R; van der Heide UA; Meijer GJ; van Asselen B; Raaijmakers CP; Lagendijk JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):169-82. PubMed ID: 17183134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MLC leaf width impact on the clinical dose distribution: a Monte Carlo approach.
Leal A; Sánchez-Doblado F; Arráns R; Capote R; Lagares JI; Pavón EC; Roselló J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Aug; 59(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 15275743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of MLC leaf position errors on simple and complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Ludlum E; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 18182688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intensity modulated radiation therapy with multileaf collimators of different leaf widths: a comparison of achievable dose distributions.
Nill S; Tücking T; Münter MW; Oelfke U
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Apr; 75(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 15878108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric discrepancies caused by differing MLC parameters for dynamic IMRT.
Wasbø E; Valen H
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):405-15. PubMed ID: 18184995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index.
Shi C; Peñagarícano J; Papanikolaou N
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 18674686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A dose verification method using a monitor unit matrix for dynamic IMRT on Varian linear accelerators.
Chen X; Yue NJ; Chen W; Saw CB; Heron DE; Stefanik D; Antemann R; Huq MS
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5641-52. PubMed ID: 16306658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A generalized inverse planning tool for volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Cao D; Afghan MK; Ye J; Chen F; Shepard DM
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):6725-38. PubMed ID: 19841516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical introduction of a linac head-mounted 2D detector array based quality assurance system in head and neck IMRT.
Korevaar EW; Wauben DJ; van der Hulst PC; Langendijk JA; Van't Veld AA
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 21963288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On comparing the quality of head and neck IMRT plans delivered with two different linear accelerator manufacturers.
Basran PS; Balogh J; Poon I; MacKenzie R; Chan T
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20346644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intensity modulated radiotherapy improves target coverage and parotid gland sparing when delivering total mucosal irradiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck of unknown primary site.
Bhide S; Clark C; Harrington K; Nutting CM
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 17707198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison between 3DCRT and IMRT using different multileaf collimators in the treatment of brain tumors.
Ding M; Newman F; Chen C; Stuhr K; Gaspar LE
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19181248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of larynx-sparing techniques with IMRT when treating the head and neck.
Webster GJ; Rowbottom CG; Ho KF; Slevin NJ; Mackay RI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):617-22. PubMed ID: 18793966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study.
Verbakel WF; Cuijpers JP; Hoffmans D; Bieker M; Slotman BJ; Senan S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):252-9. PubMed ID: 19362244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
