These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17183182)

  • 1. In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar.
    Nagaratna PJ; Shashikiran ND; Subbareddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Dec; 24(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 17183182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
    Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbiological assessment of root canals following use of rotary and manual instruments in primary molars.
    Subramaniam P; Tabrez TA; Babu KL
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 38(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 24683774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
    D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
    Azar MR; Mokhtare M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT.
    Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques.
    Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
    Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
    Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
    Schäfer E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
    Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro comparison of canal preparation using two automated rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques.
    Jardine SJ; Gulabivala K
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 11307215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Rotary Endodontic Instruments on Smear Layer Removal in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Subramaniam P; Girish Babu KL; Tabrez TA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 26950816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study.
    Schäfer E; Schulz-Bongert U; Tulus G
    J Endod; 2004 Jun; 30(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 15167474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
    Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
    Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Atomic force microscopy study of stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files.
    Valois CR; Silva LP; Azevedo RB
    J Endod; 2005 Dec; 31(12):882-5. PubMed ID: 16306823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.