These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17183295)

  • 1. Measures for measures.
    Lehmann S; Jackson AD; Lautrup BE
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7122):1003-4. PubMed ID: 17183295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Desirable scientific conduct.
    Bateson P
    Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5710):645. PubMed ID: 15692017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A possible way out of the impact-factor game.
    Tse H
    Nature; 2008 Aug; 454(7207):938-9. PubMed ID: 18719564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Achievement index climbs the ranks.
    Ball P
    Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):737. PubMed ID: 17700666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. H-index: however ranked, citations need context.
    Wendl MC
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7161):403. PubMed ID: 17898746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. H-index: age and sex make it unreliable.
    Kelly CD; Jennions MD
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7161):403. PubMed ID: 17898745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The scientific impact of nations.
    King DA
    Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6997):311-6. PubMed ID: 15254529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research sans frontières.
    Gilbert N
    Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7340):559. PubMed ID: 21455148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation: Moving away from metrics.
    Kun H
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S18-20. PubMed ID: 25924194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research assessment: the limits of excellence.
    McGilvray A
    Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7510):S64-6. PubMed ID: 25054853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact: Akin to quantifying dreams.
    Woodgett J
    Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7475):198. PubMed ID: 24226881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact: China needs to review its metrics.
    Ma X; Song Z
    Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7475):198. PubMed ID: 24226882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspective: powering up citations.
    Finkel A
    Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7510):S77. PubMed ID: 25054856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact-factor rewards affect Spanish research.
    Jiménez-Contreras E; Delgado López-Cózar E; Ruiz-Pérez R; Fernández VM
    Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6892):898. PubMed ID: 12087380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fewer numbers, better science.
    Benedictus R; Miedema F; Ferguson MW
    Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7626):453-455. PubMed ID: 27786219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated grading of research performance clearly fails to measure up.
    Haeffner-Cavaillon N; Graillot-Gak C; Bréchot C
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7068):559. PubMed ID: 16319861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Let's move beyond the rhetoric: it's time to change how we judge research.
    Curry S
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7691):147. PubMed ID: 29420505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The maze of impact metrics.
    Nature; 2013 Oct; 502(7471):271. PubMed ID: 24137834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.
    Hicks D; Wouters P; Waltman L; de Rijcke S; Rafols I
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7548):429-31. PubMed ID: 25903611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rising stars.
    Phillips N
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):S49. PubMed ID: 27463074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.