These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17183788)
21. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures. Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla. Bellini CM; Romeo D; Galbusera F; Agliardi E; Pietrabissa R; Zampelis A; Francetti L Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 19418861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses. Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combined influence of implant diameter and alveolar ridge width on crestal bone stress: a quantitative approach. Yu W; Jang YJ; Kyung HM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 19344030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses. Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of vertical interarch space and abutment height on stress distributions: a 3D finite element analysis. Naveau A; Renault P; Pierrisnard L Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 19645311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading. Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis. Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-dimensional finite elemental analysis of zygomatic implants in craniofacial structures. Ujigawa K; Kato Y; Kizu Y; Tonogi M; Yamane GY Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):620-5. PubMed ID: 17517497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The dynamic natures of implant loading. Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of 2D and 3D finite element analysis of a restored tooth. Romeed SA; Fok SL; Wilson NH J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 33(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 16512887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Chang CH; Hsu JT; Fallgatter AM; Ko CC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 17929515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Van Staden RC; Guan H; Loo YC Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Aug; 9(4):257-70. PubMed ID: 17132532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Siegele D; Soltesz U Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 2639862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A finite element analysis of stress distribution in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled or splinted dental implants. Bergkvist G; Simonsson K; Rydberg K; Johansson F; Dérand T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 18254739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? Maeda Y; Miura J; Taki I; Sogo M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 17608737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Selections of the cylinder implant neck taper and implant end fillet for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Kong L; Sun Y; Hu K; Liu Y; Li D; Qiu Z; Liu B J Biomech; 2008; 41(5):1124-30. PubMed ID: 18258239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bone stress for a mini-implant close to the roots of adjacent teeth--3D finite element analysis. Motoyoshi M; Ueno S; Okazaki K; Shimizu N Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 38(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 19269789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of coating thickness and its material on the stress distribution for dental implants. Hedia HS J Med Eng Technol; 2007; 31(4):280-7. PubMed ID: 17566931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]