126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1718410)
1. [Frequency distribution, microscopic image analysis and grading of mammary carcinoma].
Guski H; Winzer KJ; Seidenfaden U; Hufnagl P; Wolf G
Zentralbl Pathol; 1991; 137(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 1718410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Morphological possibilities for objectification of the prognosis for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast].
Theissig F; Haroske G; Dimmer V; Kunze KD; Meyer W
Zentralbl Pathol; 1991; 137(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 1718409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective nuclear grading for node-negative breast cancer patients: comparison of quasi-3D and 2D image-analysis based on light microscopic images.
Albert R; Müller JG; Kristen P; Harms H
Lab Invest; 1998 Mar; 78(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 9520938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital cell image analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei from human papillary, medullary, colloid, lobular and comedocarcinomas of the breast.
Zandona C; Budel V; Larsimont D; Petein M; Gasperin P; Pasteels JL; Kiss R
Anticancer Res; 1994; 14(5B):2173-82. PubMed ID: 7530931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Grading, staging, DNA content and prognosis of invasive ductal breast cancer].
Theissig F; Kunze KD; Haroske G; Meyer W; Dimmer V
Zentralbl Chir; 1990; 115(7):433-9. PubMed ID: 2164288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Contents of nuclear Feulgen-DNA in carcinoma of the breast. Cytophotometric analysis].
Ricevuti G; Barni S
Arch Sci Med (Torino); 1983; 140(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 6201153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Automated microscopic image analysis and the prognosis of preneoplasms and carcinomas of the mammary gland].
Guski H; Hufnagl P; Freitag A; Winzer KJ
Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb; 1989; 135(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 2544475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Introduction of the cytological grading, the nuclear area, the DNA index and the DNA histogram type in the setting up of a score for ductal breast carcinoma.
Budel V; Merle S; Gasperin P; Collet JF; De Maublanc MA; Kiss R
Anticancer Res; 1994; 14(6B):2845-51. PubMed ID: 7532932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of nuclear image cytometry, histopathological grading and DNA cytometry to make breast cancer prognosis more objective.
Theissig F; Dimmer V; Haroske G; Kunze KD; Meyer W
Anal Cell Pathol; 1991 Nov; 3(6):351-60. PubMed ID: 1751402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided classification of breast cancer nuclei.
Schnorrenberg F; Pattichis CS; Schizas CN; Kyriacou K; Vassiliou M
Technol Health Care; 1996 Aug; 4(2):147-61. PubMed ID: 8885093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic significance (relapse, non-relapse) of nuclear shape parameters in lymph node negative breast cancer.
Umbricht C; Oberholzer M; Gschwind R; Christen H; Torhorst J
Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Feb; 1(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2562217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immunocytochemistry and image cytometry of progesterone receptors in breast carcinoma imprints. Expression of tissular and cellular heterogeneity: relations to biochemical assay, clinical and histological parameters and DNA analysis.
Seigneurin D; Cohen O; Louis J
Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Apr; 1(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 2484853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grading and prognosis of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma by nuclear image analysis in tissue sections.
Kunze KD; Haroske G; Dimmer V; Meyer W; Theissig F
Pathol Res Pract; 1989 Nov; 185(5):689-93. PubMed ID: 2560542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative nuclear morphometry by image analysis for prediction of recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Hoque A; Lippman SM; Boiko IV; Atkinson EN; Sneige N; Sahin A; Weber DM; Risin S; Lagios MD; Schwarting R; Colburn WJ; Dhingra K; Follen M; Kelloff GJ; Boone CW; Hittelman WN
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Mar; 10(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 11303595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distribution of nuclear size and internuclear distance are important criteria for grading astrocytomas.
Nafe R; Van de Nes J; Yan B; Schlote W
Clin Neuropathol; 2006; 25(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 16465775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grading: a pleiotropic marker of chemosensitivity in invasive ductal breast carcinomas treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Amat S; Penault-Llorca F; Cure H; Le Bouedëc G; Achard JL; Van Praagh I; Feillel V; Mouret-Reynier MA; Dauplat J; Chollet P
Int J Oncol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):791-6. PubMed ID: 11894126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cytopathological grading, as a predictor of histopathological grade, in ductal carcinoma (NOS) of breast, on air-dried Diff-Quik smears.
Khan MZ; Haleem A; Al Hassani H; Kfoury H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Oct; 29(4):185-93. PubMed ID: 14506669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative aspects in defining prognostic factors of breast cancer.
Komitowski D; Kett P; Janson C; Jarasch ED
Pathol Res Pract; 1989 Nov; 185(5):621-4. PubMed ID: 2560540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Counting mitoses by image processing in Feulgen stained breast cancer sections: the influence of resolution.
Beliën JA; Baak JP; van Diest PJ; van Ginkel AH
Cytometry; 1997 Jun; 28(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 9181303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative study of ductal breast cancer progression: nuclear signatures for evaluation of progression grade.
Mombello A; Mariuzzi L; Morelli L; Granchelli G; Rucco V; Tarocco E; da Silva VD; Thompson D; Bartels HG; Bartels PH; Mariuzzi G
Adv Clin Path; 2001 Jul; 5(3):59-70. PubMed ID: 11753877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
