BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17184767)

  • 1. Effect of ventilation rate on gradient of aerial contaminants in the confinement pig building.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim HT; Kim YS; Roh YM; Kim CN
    Environ Res; 2007 Mar; 103(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17184767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal and spatial distributions of aerial contaminants in an enclosed pig building in winter.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Lee KJ; Park JB; Kim CN
    Environ Res; 2005 Oct; 99(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 16194664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings.
    Duchaine C; Grimard Y; Cormier Y
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 10772615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of particles, ammonia and endotoxin in swine confinement operations.
    Pickrell JA; Heber AJ; Murphy JP; Henry SC; May MM; Nolan D; Oehme FW; Gillespie JR; Schoneweis D
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1993 Oct; 35(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 8249265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exposure assessment to airborne endotoxin, dust, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in open style swine houses.
    Chang CW; Chung H; Huang CF; Su HJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Aug; 45(6):457-65. PubMed ID: 11513795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of extreme seasons on airborne pollutant levels in a pig-confinement building.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim HT; Kim YS; Roh YM; Lee CM; Kim CN
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2007; 62(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18171644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of manual feeding on the level of farmer's exposure to airborne contaminants in the confinement nursery pig house.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim HT; Kim CN; Kim YS; Roh YM
    Ind Health; 2008 Apr; 46(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 18413966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Airborne dust, ammonia, microorganisms, and antigens in pig confinement houses and the respiratory health of exposed farm workers.
    Crook B; Robertson JF; Glass SA; Botheroyd EM; Lacey J; Topping MD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Jul; 52(7):271-9. PubMed ID: 1951065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Korean farmer's exposure level to dust in pig buildings.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim YS; Kim CN
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2008; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 18581979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total and respirable dust in swine confinement buildings: the benefit of respiratory protective masks and effect of recirculated air.
    Pickrell JA; Heber AJ; Murphy JP; Henry SC; May MM; Nolan D; Gearhart SK; Cederberg BL; Oehme FW; Schoneweis D
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1995 Oct; 37(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 8592829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association of environmental air contaminants with disease and productivity in swine.
    Donham KJ
    Am J Vet Res; 1991 Oct; 52(10):1723-30. PubMed ID: 1767997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Gestation Pens Versus Stalls and Wet Versus Dry Feed on Air Contaminants in Swine Production.
    Raynor PC; Engelman S; Murphy D; Ramachandran G; Bender JB; Alexander BH
    J Agromedicine; 2018; 23(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 28976266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of the relationship between airborne contaminants and environmental factors in Dutch swine confinement buildings.
    Attwood P; Brouwer R; Ruigewaard P; Versloot P; de Wit R; Heederik D; Boleij JS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Aug; 48(8):745-51. PubMed ID: 3630921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental study of poultry confinement buildings.
    Jones W; Morring K; Olenchock SA; Williams T; Hickey J
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Nov; 45(11):760-6. PubMed ID: 6439021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Nature and amount of aerial pollutants from livestock buildings].
    Hartung J
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1998 Jun; 105(6):213-6. PubMed ID: 9693454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Recirculating Ventilation With Dust Filtration to Improve Wintertime Air Quality in a Swine Farrowing Room.
    Anthony TR; Altmaier R; Jones S; Gassman R; Park JH; Peters TM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(9):635-46. PubMed ID: 25950713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aspergillus and other human respiratory disease agents in turkey confinement houses.
    Mulhausen JR; McJilton CE; Redig PT; Janni KA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Nov; 48(11):894-9. PubMed ID: 3425548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Relationship between the concentration of different bioaerosol components and the general hygienic condition in two pig fattening houses].
    Zucker BA; Bonin H; Müller W
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005; 118(5-6):224-8. PubMed ID: 15918487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 2. Airborne pollutants.
    Banhazi TM; Seedorf J; Rutley DL; Pitchford WS
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jan; 14(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 18376533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of air quality at neighbor residences in the vicinity of swine production facilities.
    Donham KJ; Lee JA; Thu K; Reynolds SJ
    J Agromedicine; 2006; 11(3-4):15-24. PubMed ID: 19274894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.