These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17184767)

  • 1. Effect of ventilation rate on gradient of aerial contaminants in the confinement pig building.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim HT; Kim YS; Roh YM; Kim CN
    Environ Res; 2007 Mar; 103(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17184767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal and spatial distributions of aerial contaminants in an enclosed pig building in winter.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Lee KJ; Park JB; Kim CN
    Environ Res; 2005 Oct; 99(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 16194664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings.
    Duchaine C; Grimard Y; Cormier Y
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 10772615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of particles, ammonia and endotoxin in swine confinement operations.
    Pickrell JA; Heber AJ; Murphy JP; Henry SC; May MM; Nolan D; Oehme FW; Gillespie JR; Schoneweis D
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1993 Oct; 35(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 8249265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exposure assessment to airborne endotoxin, dust, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in open style swine houses.
    Chang CW; Chung H; Huang CF; Su HJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Aug; 45(6):457-65. PubMed ID: 11513795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of extreme seasons on airborne pollutant levels in a pig-confinement building.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim HT; Kim YS; Roh YM; Lee CM; Kim CN
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2007; 62(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18171644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of manual feeding on the level of farmer's exposure to airborne contaminants in the confinement nursery pig house.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim HT; Kim CN; Kim YS; Roh YM
    Ind Health; 2008 Apr; 46(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 18413966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Airborne dust, ammonia, microorganisms, and antigens in pig confinement houses and the respiratory health of exposed farm workers.
    Crook B; Robertson JF; Glass SA; Botheroyd EM; Lacey J; Topping MD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Jul; 52(7):271-9. PubMed ID: 1951065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Korean farmer's exposure level to dust in pig buildings.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim YS; Kim CN
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2008; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 18581979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total and respirable dust in swine confinement buildings: the benefit of respiratory protective masks and effect of recirculated air.
    Pickrell JA; Heber AJ; Murphy JP; Henry SC; May MM; Nolan D; Gearhart SK; Cederberg BL; Oehme FW; Schoneweis D
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1995 Oct; 37(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 8592829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association of environmental air contaminants with disease and productivity in swine.
    Donham KJ
    Am J Vet Res; 1991 Oct; 52(10):1723-30. PubMed ID: 1767997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Gestation Pens Versus Stalls and Wet Versus Dry Feed on Air Contaminants in Swine Production.
    Raynor PC; Engelman S; Murphy D; Ramachandran G; Bender JB; Alexander BH
    J Agromedicine; 2018; 23(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 28976266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of the relationship between airborne contaminants and environmental factors in Dutch swine confinement buildings.
    Attwood P; Brouwer R; Ruigewaard P; Versloot P; de Wit R; Heederik D; Boleij JS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Aug; 48(8):745-51. PubMed ID: 3630921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental study of poultry confinement buildings.
    Jones W; Morring K; Olenchock SA; Williams T; Hickey J
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Nov; 45(11):760-6. PubMed ID: 6439021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Nature and amount of aerial pollutants from livestock buildings].
    Hartung J
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1998 Jun; 105(6):213-6. PubMed ID: 9693454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Recirculating Ventilation With Dust Filtration to Improve Wintertime Air Quality in a Swine Farrowing Room.
    Anthony TR; Altmaier R; Jones S; Gassman R; Park JH; Peters TM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(9):635-46. PubMed ID: 25950713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aspergillus and other human respiratory disease agents in turkey confinement houses.
    Mulhausen JR; McJilton CE; Redig PT; Janni KA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Nov; 48(11):894-9. PubMed ID: 3425548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Relationship between the concentration of different bioaerosol components and the general hygienic condition in two pig fattening houses].
    Zucker BA; Bonin H; Müller W
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005; 118(5-6):224-8. PubMed ID: 15918487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 2. Airborne pollutants.
    Banhazi TM; Seedorf J; Rutley DL; Pitchford WS
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jan; 14(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 18376533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of air quality at neighbor residences in the vicinity of swine production facilities.
    Donham KJ; Lee JA; Thu K; Reynolds SJ
    J Agromedicine; 2006; 11(3-4):15-24. PubMed ID: 19274894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.