These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17184805)

  • 1. Stereo channels with different temporal frequency tunings.
    Lee S; Shioiri S; Yaguchi H
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 17184805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues.
    Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal aspects of spatial interactions affecting stereo-matching solutions.
    Zhang ZL; Cantor C; Ghose T; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(27):3183-92. PubMed ID: 15482804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception.
    Fukuda K; Kaneko H; Matsumiya K
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereo dynamics are not scale-dependent.
    Hess RF; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1911-23. PubMed ID: 16469355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis.
    Chen CC; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of depth and motion from ambiguous binocular information.
    Sakai K; Ogiya M; Hirai Y
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2471-80. PubMed ID: 15961137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stereoscopic depth discrimination with contrast windowed stimuli.
    Buckthought A; Stelmach LB
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3090-7. PubMed ID: 16765407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax.
    Bradshaw MF; Hibbard PB; Parton AD; Rose D; Langley K
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The structure of stereoscopic masking: position, disparity, and size tuning.
    Tyler CW; Kontsevich LL
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3096-108. PubMed ID: 16168458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dichoptic motion perception limited to depth of fixation?
    Lages M; Dolia A; Graf EW
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 17112562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast sensitivity of form and motion discrimination during binocular rivalry.
    Li DF; Freeman AW; Alais D
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1255-63. PubMed ID: 15733958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
    Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective biasing of stereo correspondence in an ambiguous stereogram.
    Goutcher R; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 15610751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new look at binocular stereopsis.
    Pizlo Z; Li Y; Francis G
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Disparity-energy signals in perceived stereoscopic depth.
    Tanabe S; Yasuoka S; Fujita I
    J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):22.1-10. PubMed ID: 18484828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry.
    Silver MA; Logothetis NK
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(4):532-43. PubMed ID: 17182075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A normative dataset on human global stereopsis using the quick Disparity Sensitivity Function (qDSF).
    Reynaud A; Gao Y; Hess RF
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt A):97-103. PubMed ID: 26028556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.