These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17185166)
1. Comparison of different foreground and background selection methods in marker-assisted introgression. Bai JY; Zhang Q; Jia XP Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Dec; 33(12):1073-80. PubMed ID: 17185166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of marker-assisted selection under different initial frequency of QTL favorable allele. Lu SX; Wu CX; Lian LS Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 30(8):750-4. PubMed ID: 14682244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. Muir WM J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle. Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary factors affecting the evaluation accuracy of animal model MBLUP. Lu SX; Wu CX; Lian LS Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Jan; 30(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 12812074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method to detect recombination between a genetic marker and the QTL that it marks. Kinghorn BP J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 20536637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consequences of selection for improving production traits on the frequency of deleterious alleles for fitness. Kearney JF; Navarro P; Haley CS; Villanueva B J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):850-9. PubMed ID: 18997080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle. Hayes BJ; Chamberlain AJ; McPartlan H; Macleod I; Sethuraman L; Goddard ME Genet Res; 2007 Aug; 89(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 18208627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing selection on multiple identified quantitative trait loci in population with overlapping generations. Tang GQ; Li XW Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 May; 33(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 16722338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A dynamic deterministic model to optimize a multiple-trait selection scheme. Costard AD; Vitezica ZG; Moreno CR; Elsen JM J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):885-94. PubMed ID: 19028846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal utilization of non-additive quantitative trait locus in animal breeding programs. Li Y; Van der Werf JH; Kinghorn BP J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Oct; 125(5):342-50. PubMed ID: 18803790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of marker-assisted selection in animal breeding and biotechnology. Williams JL Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):379-91. PubMed ID: 16110903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strategies for continual application of marker-assisted selection in an open nucleus population. Stella A; Lohuis MM; Pagnacco G; Jansen GB J Dairy Sci; 2002 Sep; 85(9):2358-67. PubMed ID: 12362469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Genome-wide associations between hybrid sterility QTL and marker transmission ratio distortion. Moyle LC; Graham EB; Mol Biol Evol; 2006 May; 23(5):973-80. PubMed ID: 16495346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of quantitative trait loci affecting intramuscular fat and reproductive traits in pigs using marker-assisted introgression. Sato S; Ohnishi C; Kikuchi T; Kohira K; Egawa S; Terai S; Nakamura T; Arata S; Komatsuda A; Uemoto Y Anim Genet; 2014 Dec; 45(6):799-807. PubMed ID: 25099662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]