BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17185478)

  • 1. A pilot Rasch scaling of lawyers' perceptions of expert bias.
    Dattilio FM; Commons ML; Adams KM; Gutheil TG; Sadoff RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 17185478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic experts' perceptions of expert bias.
    Commons ML; Miller PM; Li EY; Gutheil TG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(5-6):362-71. PubMed ID: 23046867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert witness perceptions of bias in experts.
    Commons ML; Miller PM; Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 15497632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Telling tales out of court": a pilot study of experts' disclosures about opposing experts.
    Gutheil TG; Commons ML; Miller PM; LaLlave J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 11196255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attorneys' requests for complete tax records from opposing expert witnesses: some approaches to the problem.
    Gutheil TG; Simon RI; Simpson S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 17185482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Courtroom whores"?--or why do attorneys call us?: findings from a survey on attorneys' use of mental health experts.
    Mossman D; Kapp MB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 9554707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hindsight bias among psychiatrists.
    LeBourgeois HW; Pinals DA; Williams V; Appelbaum PS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 17389347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation.
    Martelli MF; Zasler ND; Johnson-Greene D
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2001 Aug; 12(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 11478189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--stand for evaluating medical expert assessment].
    Kienzle HF
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):592-6. PubMed ID: 9064929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Truth in forensic psychiatry: a cultural response to Gutheil and colleagues.
    Griffith EE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 14974797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of imaging in United States courtrooms.
    Patel P; Meltzer CC; Mayberg HS; Levine K
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2007 Nov; 17(4):557-67, x. PubMed ID: 17983970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic psychiatric testimony under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
    Slovenko R
    Leg Med; 1995; ():241-60. PubMed ID: 8788672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The presentation of expert testimony via live audio-visual communication.
    Miller RD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 2039847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The whole truth versus the admissible truth.
    Gutheil TG; Hauser M; Spruiell G; White MS; Strasburger LH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):340. PubMed ID: 15515925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a critical forensic psychiatry.
    Deaton RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 12875502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Development of expert assessment in the malpractice lawsuit from the viewpoint of the judge].
    Franzki H
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):652-6; discussion 656-7. PubMed ID: 9064942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A nationwide questionnaire survey of medical experts in mental health evaluation].
    Koike J; Morita N; Nakatani Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 19301591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Keeping criticism at bay: suggestions for forensic psychiatry experts.
    Friend A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 14974793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of the expert witness in the adversarial legal system.
    Beran RG
    J Law Med; 2009 Aug; 17(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 19771993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adventures in the twilight zone: empirical studies of the attorney-expert relationship.
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11302380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.