These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17185487)
1. Clark v. Arizona: diminishing the right of mentally ill individuals to a full and fair defense. Wortzel H; Metzner J J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 17185487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The slayer statute and insanity. Piel J; Leong GB J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 20542948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense. LeBlanc SM Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants. Morris DR; Parker GF J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial. Klein DW Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Reasonable medical certainty": can we meet Daubert standards in insanity cases? Poythress NG J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 15515909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane. Melamed Y; Ganot N; Mester R; Bleich A Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2008; 45(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19439834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity. Covey RD Stanford Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 61(6):1375-428. PubMed ID: 19489183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity. Rendell JA; Huss MT; Jensen ML Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 20014145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change? Leong GB J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Response to Simon: Legal relevance demands that evil be defined and standardized. Welner M J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 14974795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Revisiting the deific-decree doctrine in Washington state. Leong GB J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 18354130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada. Winick BJ N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The privatization of the civil commitment process and the state action doctrine: have the mentally ill been systematically stripped of their Fourteenth Amendment rights? Brooks W Duquesne Law Rev; 2001; 40(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 16518904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty. Abeles N Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Civil commitment and the criminal insanity plea in Israeli law. Toib JA Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(4):308-18. PubMed ID: 18374417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary: getting at the truth about pathological lying. Grubin D J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 16186199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]